In recent times, the central concept of “a good judgment" or “professional judgement” has once again been on the back burner in the general debate about the transformation of work practice life. Not least in relation to renewed discussions of the role of artificial intelligence ( AI) asking once again; who is really the smartest one – the humans or the machine? Jonna Bornemark talked about the forgotten “human judgement” in her celebrated speech before the opening of the Swedish Riksdag in 2019, where she was questioning the lack of trust in the official's personal judgement skills. Gradually, the concept of “professional judgment” has been abstracted, discussed, and redefined, but it remains undefined and open for individual interpretation. However, the ability of making swift and informed decisions and choices in a stressful and narrow situation has always been relevant in most of the professions that vocational teaching is about. Concepts are also essential in the understanding of the practical knowledge as well as in the knowledge-theoretical base of the professional knowledge also including silenced or tacit knowledge.
Hargreaves and Fullan (2013) divide professional knowledge in three different dimensions of professional capital, i.e. human capital, social capital, and decision-making capital. All these parts are essential for a work practice of good quality. These could also be seen as vital parts of developing a “good judgment” as well as qualitative teaching. These dimensions are also important for analyses of didactic choices in a teaching- and learning situation about conceptualization of your own, embedded, and silent professional knowledge.
Bornemark (2020) adds new aspects to the concept of judgment by talking about a “pactive judgment “and its need of space and agency in addition to dimensions of power. This new discussion based on a working life that is undergoing rapid transformation makes it interesting to empirically examine how it is used in the social discourse today; "if" and if so "how" the concept of “professional judgement” is used or linked to in the practices of vocational teachers didactics and in which contexts. It is not an easy concept to introduce and make understandable in the physical and virtual spaces where learning takes place today, which is why it would be interesting to perform a deep dive in this area.
This abstract draws upon an ongoing pilot study, empirically based on ethnographic interviews and observations and constructive grounded theory. My presentation will focus on didactic choices and strategies concerning understanding of non-specific concepts and chosen by the teachers to create a god learning situation for their students. I will also give a brief overview of concept development within the subject area of work practice and technology and discuss the research connection of several central concepts within this research area which is of relevance for the vocational teacher program activities. The questions I would like to explore further in my study, are ongoing work, based on a few empirical examples, therefore the over-arching research question still is highly tentative and open for re-configuration.
• What conversation strategies, models, examples and or other forms of representation does the vocational teacher generally use in his teaching around elastic, practical concepts of knowledge, and how is a learning interaction stimulated and created in situ?
• In which didactic contexts do vocational teachers talk about terms like “judgment “and
“tacit knowledge” and how these links to a specific profession and a developed professional knowledge?
• What different semiotic, multimodal resources such as writing, speech, gestures, or other illustrative instructions are used to introduce the concept of judgment in these contexts?
• How are conceptual discussions like these handled within, for example, adult education, which has an increasingly large element of foreign-born students?
• In what way can these activities be supported and developed?
References:
Bornemark, J (2019) Tal inför riksdagens öppnande, URL: https://volante.se/texter/jonna-bornemarks-tal-infor-riksmotets-oppnande-2/
Bornemark, J(2020)Horisonten finns alltid kvar: Om det bortglömda omdömet. Stockholm: Volante Förlag
Jahnke, A: (2019) Utveckla utbildning: vetenskaplig grund, beprövad erfarenhet, tyst kunskap. Stockholm: Liber
Haregreaves, A & Fullan, (2013) Professionellt kapital: att utveckla undervisning i alla skolor. Lund:Studentlitteratur
Polanyi, M (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Garden City, New York: Doubleday