A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variabilityKWR Watercycle Res Inst, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Mediterranean Agr & Forest Syst CNR ISAFoM, I-80056 Ercolano, NA, Italy.
Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Mediterranean Agr & Forest Syst CNR ISAFoM, I-80056 Ercolano, NA, Italy.
Univ Liege, Unite Modelisat Climat & Cycles Biogeochim, B-4000 Liege, Belgium.
Tech Univ Munich, Chair Ecoclimatol, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forest Syst DIBAF, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Environm Sci & Energy Res, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel.
ETH, Inst Terr Ecosyst ITES, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Univ Lisbon, Inst Geog & Spatial Planning IGOT, P-1600214 Lisbon, Portugal.
European Acad Bolzano Bozen, Inst Alpine Environm, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy; Univ Innsbruck, Inst Ecol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Mediterranean Agr & Forest Syst CNR ISAFoM, I-80056 Ercolano, NA, Italy.
Univ Innsbruck, Inst Ecol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forest Syst DIBAF, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Univ Liege, Unite Modelisat Climat & Cycles Biogeochim, B-4000 Liege, Belgium.
Tech Univ Munich, Chair Ecoclimatol, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
Univ Evora, Dept Landscape Environm & Planning, P-7000671 Evora, Portugal.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Global Change Biology, ISSN 1354-1013, E-ISSN 1365-2486, Vol. 19, no 1, p. 75-89Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
We review observational, experimental, and model results on how plants respond to extreme climatic conditions induced by changing climatic variability. Distinguishing between impacts of changing mean climatic conditions and changing climatic variability on terrestrial ecosystems is generally underrated in current studies. The goals of our review are thus (1) to identify plant processes that are vulnerable to changes in the variability of climatic variables rather than to changes in their mean, and (2) to depict/evaluate available study designs to quantify responses of plants to changing climatic variability. We find that phenology is largely affected by changing mean climate but also that impacts of climatic variability are much less studied, although potentially damaging. We note that plant water relations seem to be very vulnerable to extremes driven by changes in temperature and precipitation and that heatwaves and flooding have stronger impacts on physiological processes than changing mean climate. Moreover, interacting phenological and physiological processes are likely to further complicate plant responses to changing climatic variability. Phenological and physiological processes and their interactions culminate in even more sophisticated responses to changing mean climate and climatic variability at the species and community level. Generally, observational studies are well suited to study plant responses to changing mean climate, but less suitable to gain a mechanistic understanding of plant responses to climatic variability. Experiments seem best suited to simulate extreme events. In models, temporal resolution and model structure are crucial to capture plant responses to changing climatic variability. We highlight that a combination of experimental, observational, and/or modeling studies have the potential to overcome important caveats of the respective individual approaches.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, 2013. Vol. 19, no 1, p. 75-89
National Category
Climate Research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-89424DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-89424DiVA, id: diva2:1357557
2019-10-042019-10-042019-10-04