lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘I don’t want to tell you how to do your job, but …’: laypersons challenging the jurisdiction of professionals in Swedish child protection
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg. (RISCY)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5644-2455
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nordic Social Work Research, ISSN 2156-857X, E-ISSN 2156-8588, Vol. 8, nr 1, s. 50-63Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

In the early days of professionalism, occupations were characterised by decision-making freedoms and strong jurisdictional rights. Since then, several ways of controlling and monitoring professionals have been introduced alongside the rise and reformulations of the modern welfare state. Professions have been challenged by, bureaucracy, market solutions and demands for transparency. These are examples of systematically developed counterforces to professional autonomy. A much less studied way of controlling and monitoring professionals is the institution of laypersons, which finds its legitimacy on the grounds that non-experts play the superior role to professionals. Through layperson committees, Swedish child protection advocates have extensive rights when deciding upon some of the most intrusive decisions that the state can make against families, namely, whether children are to be removed from their parents. This article analyses how laypersons challenge the authority of professionals in Swedish child protection. It is based on observations of layperson committees and semi-structured interviews with committee members. The results show that the jurisdictional boundaries are constructed in relation to groupthink, where the laypersons can be the cure for social workers developing unprofessional behaviours and remain as outsiders to the professionals. Another important finding of the study is the ambivalence and paradoxes that arise when it comes to understanding the layperson’s role in relation to at least five topics: formal training; identity as a professional, theoretical knowledge; the normative field laypersons should relate to; and the layperson’s impact. The ambivalence of the ideological boundaries can be seen as a weakness for the layperson.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 8, nr 1, s. 50-63
Emneord [sv]
Social work, Child protection, Sweden, Laypersons, Sociology of professions
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Samhällsvetenskap, Socialt arbete
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-70683DOI: 10.1080/2156857X.2017.1376703OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-70683DiVA, id: diva2:1193868
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2010:0821Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-28 Laget: 2018-03-28 Sist oppdatert: 2018-08-14bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Forkby, Torbjörn

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Forkby, Torbjörn
I samme tidsskrift
Nordic Social Work Research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 63 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf