lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Geht auch weniger? Stand der Diskussion in Schweden: "Is it possible to do less?" the current state of the debate in Sweden
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för Hälso- och livsvetenskap (FHL), Institutionen för hälso- och vårdvetenskap (HV). Kalmar County Hospital.
2013 (tysk)Inngår i: Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, ISSN 1865-9217, E-ISSN 2212-0289, Vol. 107, nr 2, s. 140-147Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The question "Is it possible to do less?" and the claim "Less is more!" can be answered and construed in different ways. One possible interpretation, which is well established in the Swedish health system, is "Accomplishing more (of the things that are important) by doing less (of the things that are dispensable)". Essentially, this is the basis of prioritisation in Swedish health care. While the concept of prioritisation is very well established in Sweden, the discussion about prioritising in Germany has always been difficult. It is, from a Swedish perspective, unclear why, of all things, health care should be exempted from prioritisation which otherwise is a necessity concerning all aspects of human and societal life. Some conditions complicate prioritisation in German health care, including the system of private and statutory health insurance and economic incentives which do not reward procedures based on indications. It will be argued that the Swedish health care system is more effective than the German not at least because of the system of prioritisation that allows for providing more necessary and essential health care instead of offering unnecessary and dubious procedures, thereby also improving patient outcome.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2013. Vol. 107, nr 2, s. 140-147
Emneord [en]
Distributive justice, Germany, Prioritisation, Sweden
Emneord [de]
Priorisierung, Schweden, Deutschland, Verteilungsgerechtigkeit
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Hälsovetenskap, Vårdvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-63072DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.02.002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84877736834OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-63072DiVA, id: diva2:1093655
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-05-08 Laget: 2017-05-08 Sist oppdatert: 2017-05-10bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Carlsson, Jörg

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Carlsson, Jörg
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 73 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf