lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cons and Pros of Epidemiological Versus Experimental Approaches to Answer Questions About Risk and Protective Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Personal Journey
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för Hälso- och livsvetenskap (FHL), Institutionen för psykologi (PSY). Karolinska Institutet.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0057-0308
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: SAGE Research Methods Cases, London: Sage Publications, 2018, s. 1-17Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

This text is a personal account of the research process that led to a dissertation about the long-term relevance of social and emotional factors for cognitive health. It describes how research ideas and methodological concerns developed out of the first results where people who had lived alone, especially after being widowed already in midlife, had a high risk increase for Alzheimer’s disease over two decades later. A second study investigated the associations between feelings of hopelessness in midlife and cognitive health in later life. Both of these studies used an epidemiological association approach with logistic regression as the main statistical method, including adjustments for several relevant variables. To address the methodological concerns in the epidemiological association approach, primarily the risk of reverse causation and confounding variables, a subsequent study applied a randomized control experimental design. In this study, the effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels from different types of activities were measured in healthy elderly persons through a within-subject cross-over design. The case study illustrates the compromises that had to be made through this methodological shift in relation to the original research question—compromises in terms of real-life outcomes and exposures in exchange for experimental control and establishment of causality. The relative merits and limitations of three main approaches are finally summarized in light of these experiences: experimental studies on animals and on humans and epidemiological associations in humans. The examples are from research on dementia, but should be relevant for many other research questions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
London: Sage Publications, 2018. s. 1-17
Emneord [en]
Methodology, Dementia, Alzheimer's disease
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Samhällsvetenskap, Psykologi; Medicin, Gerontologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-71726DOI: 10.4135/9781526430649ISBN: 9781526430649 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-71726DiVA, id: diva2:1192055
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-21 Laget: 2018-03-21 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-29bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Håkansson, Krister

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Håkansson, Krister
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 94 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf