lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability and Validity of the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Social Resources Scale in six European Countries
Swansea University, UK.
University of Wales, UK.
University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
University of Trento, Italy.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2007 (engelsk)Inngår i: The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, ISSN 1079-5014, E-ISSN 1758-5368, Vol. 62, nr 6, s. 371-379Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives. The purpose of this article is to examine data quality, reliability, and construct validity of the Older Americans Resources and Services social resources scale in six European countries (The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy, Austria, the United Kingdom, and Sweden).

Methods. A questionnaire was administered through face-to-face interviews in five countries, and postal interview in the sixth, to representative populations of adults aged 50 to 90 living independently (N = 12,478). This article examines missing values and distribution of items in the social resources scale, and consistency of skew and kurtosis across countries. We performed item–total correlations and ran confirmatory factor analyses to test a three-factor model obtained in previous U.S. and Spanish analyses. Cronbach's alpha determined the reliability of the factors.

Results. We observed a relatively large proportion of missing data for one item (have someone who would help you). All items correlated with a score equal to or greater than 0.20. Although the confirmatory factor analyses generally supported the acceptability of the three-factor structure in the European data, the reliability of two dimensions (dependability and affective) was unacceptably low.

Discussion. Differences across countries make it unlikely that researchers can develop a single social resources scale that would have item equivalence in multiple countries.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
The Gerontological Society of America , 2007. Vol. 62, nr 6, s. 371-379
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-71942DOI: 10.1093/geronb/62.6.S371ISI: 000253836400010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-71942DiVA, id: diva2:1194788
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-04-03 Laget: 2018-04-03 Sist oppdatert: 2018-09-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Fagerström, Cecilia

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Fagerström, Cecilia
I samme tidsskrift
The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 15 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf