lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect of different frame materials on the primary energy use of a multi storey residential building in a life cycle perspective
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för teknik (FTK), Institutionen för byggd miljö och energiteknik (BET). (Sustainable Built Environm Res Grp)
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för teknik (FTK), Institutionen för byggd miljö och energiteknik (BET). (Sustainable Built Environm Res Grp)
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för teknik (FTK), Institutionen för byggd miljö och energiteknik (BET). (Sustainable Built Environm Res Grp)
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Energy and Buildings, ISSN 0378-7788, E-ISSN 1872-6178, Vol. 185, s. 259-271Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Primary energy implications over the life cycle of a multi storey residential building with different building systems are explored here. The main structural materials of the buildings include precast concrete, cross laminated timber (CLT) and prefabricated timber modules (modular). The analysis covers energy and material flows from different life cycle phases of the building versions, designed to meet the energy performance of the Swedish building code (BBR) and passive house criteria. The CLT and modular buildings were found to result in lower production primary energy use and higher biomass residues compared to the concrete alternative. The heating value of the recoverable biomass residues from the production phase of the CLT building is significantly larger than the primary energy required for its production. Primary energy use for production and construction constitutes 20-30% and 36-47% of the total primary energy use for production, construction, space heating, ventilation and demolition for the BBR and passive buildings, respectively. Space heating with combined heat and power (CHP) and ventilation electricity for the BBR and passive building versions form 70-79% and 52-63%, respectively, of the total primary energy use for production, construction, space heating, ventilation and demolition for a lifespan of 80 years. The CLT and modular buildings give 20-37% and 9-17% lower total life cycle primary energy use, respectively, than the concrete alternative when space heating is from CHP. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 185, s. 259-271
Emneord [en]
Life cycle, Primary energy use, Residential buildings, Cross laminated timber, Timber modules, Concrete, Structural frame
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Teknik, Byggteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-81093DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.017ISI: 000459358900021Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059911195OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-81093DiVA, id: diva2:1296427
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-03-15 Laget: 2019-03-15 Sist oppdatert: 2019-08-29bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Tettey, Uniben Yao AyikoeDodoo, AmbroseGustavsson, Leif

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Tettey, Uniben Yao AyikoeDodoo, AmbroseGustavsson, Leif
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Energy and Buildings

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 100 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf