lnu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cons and Pros of Epidemiological Versus Experimental Approaches to Answer Questions About Risk and Protective Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Personal Journey
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för Hälso- och livsvetenskap (FHL), Institutionen för psykologi (PSY). Karolinska Institutet.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0057-0308
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: SAGE Research Methods Cases, London: Sage Publications, 2018, s. 1-17Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

This text is a personal account of the research process that led to a dissertation about the long-term relevance of social and emotional factors for cognitive health. It describes how research ideas and methodological concerns developed out of the first results where people who had lived alone, especially after being widowed already in midlife, had a high risk increase for Alzheimer’s disease over two decades later. A second study investigated the associations between feelings of hopelessness in midlife and cognitive health in later life. Both of these studies used an epidemiological association approach with logistic regression as the main statistical method, including adjustments for several relevant variables. To address the methodological concerns in the epidemiological association approach, primarily the risk of reverse causation and confounding variables, a subsequent study applied a randomized control experimental design. In this study, the effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels from different types of activities were measured in healthy elderly persons through a within-subject cross-over design. The case study illustrates the compromises that had to be made through this methodological shift in relation to the original research question—compromises in terms of real-life outcomes and exposures in exchange for experimental control and establishment of causality. The relative merits and limitations of three main approaches are finally summarized in light of these experiences: experimental studies on animals and on humans and epidemiological associations in humans. The examples are from research on dementia, but should be relevant for many other research questions.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
London: Sage Publications, 2018. s. 1-17
Nyckelord [en]
Methodology, Dementia, Alzheimer's disease
Nationell ämneskategori
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi
Forskningsämne
Samhällsvetenskap, Psykologi; Medicin, Gerontologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-71726DOI: 10.4135/9781526430649ISBN: 9781526430649 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-71726DiVA, id: diva2:1192055
Tillgänglig från: 2018-03-21 Skapad: 2018-03-21 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-03-29Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Håkansson, Krister

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Håkansson, Krister
Av organisationen
Institutionen för psykologi (PSY)
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 101 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf