lnu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Integrating BIM, optimization and a multi-criteria decision-making method in building design process
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för teknik (FTK), Institutionen för skog och träteknik (SOT).ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1835-7158
Jönköping University.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4216-9165
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering: Proceedings of the 35th CIB W78 2018 Conference: IT in Design, Construction, and Management / [ed] Mutis I., Hartmann T., Springer, 2018, s. 359-369Konferensbidrag, Publicerat paper (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

European Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) defined a target as all new constructed buildings within the EU region must be a zero-energy building by the end of 2020. Furthermore, all European countries must ensure the minimum comfort threshold in energy calculations. Reducing energy consumption and improving indoor comfort, including visual and thermal com-fort, can contribute to economic benefits. However, the main problem is the exi-tance of conflicts among visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. To solve the abovementioned problem and to fulfil the EPBD’s target, this study aims to apply an integration between BIM, optimiza-tion and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a multi-criteria decision-making method on an office building in Sweden. Accordingly, 3 types of windows and 5 types of external wall, ground floor and external roof constructions were specified as op-timization variables. The combination between the optimization variables gener-ated 375 design alternatives. The performance of all 375 design alternatives were evaluated with respect to visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. Later, AHP was used to find a trade-off design alternative. The results show that the combination between window type 1, external wall type 5, ground floor type 1 and external roof type 5 is the trade-off design alternative. Furthermore, the results show the integration enables to solve the abovemen-tioned conflicts and to fulfil the EPBD’s target.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer, 2018. s. 359-369
Nyckelord [en]
Building information modelling, optimization, analytical hierarchy process, decision making
Nationell ämneskategori
Husbyggnad Arkitekturteknik
Forskningsämne
Teknik, Byggteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-78210DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_43ISBN: 978-3-030-00219-0 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-78210DiVA, id: diva2:1254206
Konferens
35th CIB W78 2018 Conference IT in Design, Construction, and Management
Forskningsfinansiär
KK-stiftelsen, 20130245Tillgänglig från: 2018-10-08 Skapad: 2018-10-08 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-10-10Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Jalilzadehazhari, Elaheh

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Jalilzadehazhari, ElahehJohansson, Peter
Av organisationen
Institutionen för skog och träteknik (SOT)
HusbyggnadArkitekturteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 75 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf