lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Breaking the ice: a work domain analysis of icebreaker operations
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Kalmar Maritime Academy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1223-1311
2018 (English)In: Cognition, Technology & Work, ISSN 1435-5558, E-ISSN 1435-5566, Vol. 20, no 3, p. 443-456Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Icebreakers are special-purpose ships designed to operate in different ice-covered waters, either independently or duringassistance of weaker ships. In the Baltic Sea, as well as elsewhere, they are essential for maintaining continuous sea transportservices during wintertime. Icebreaker operations are complex, and every situation in which a vessel requires assistanceis unique, due to, e.g. changing ice and weather conditions, geographical location or language proficiency of the crew onboard the icebreaker or assisted vessel. The icebreaker crew has considerable freedom to adapt to each situation, yet, forsafe operations, there are constraints to which the crew has to conform. The study presented in this paper aims at identifyingthe constraints on nautical officers on board icebreakers during operations, as well as special situations that increasecognitive load. A work domain analysis based on a group interview with nautical icebreaker officers shows the multitudeof tasks performed on board icebreakers. Furthermore, it identifies constraints specific to icebreaker operations such as iceassessment and direct icebreaking, but also generic constraints such as language and communication skills. At times, safetyand efficiency come into conflict, resulting in a trade-off between the two. When that happens, safety gets priority, and theoperation stops until the situation has been evaluated. In addition, several situations that increase cognitive load are identified,with the common denominator that they add elements of uncertainty, e.g. severe weather and technical malfunctions.Finally, further research within the area of icebreaker operations is recommended, with a continued focus on the systemconstraints, and their potential for system improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2018. Vol. 20, no 3, p. 443-456
Keywords [en]
Maritime, Constraint, Theory of constraints, Cognitive load, Socio-technical system, Communication
National Category
Work Sciences Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Shipping, Maritime Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-73755DOI: 10.1007/s10111-018-0482-2ISI: 000439906300009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046039869OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-73755DiVA, id: diva2:1202783
Available from: 2018-04-30 Created: 2018-04-30 Last updated: 2020-06-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Creating clarity and managing complexity through co-operation and communication: The case of Swedish icebreaker operations
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Creating clarity and managing complexity through co-operation and communication: The case of Swedish icebreaker operations
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sea transportation is vital for the global economy, and the amount of seaborne trade is expected to increase in the future. In some areas, icebreakers are necessary for maintaining open shipping lanes all-year round and ensuring safe navigation. Vessels operating in ice are exposed to harsh environmental factors such as severe weather and heavy ice, and when external forces become too strong vessels will depend on icebreaker assistance. However, successful icebreaker operations require the icebreaker to operate in close vicinity to the assisted vessel to break the ice, which in turn increases the risk of collision.

There are many factors which make icebreaker operations complex. The aim of this thesis is to use work organization, operational safety, and interpersonal communication as three lenses to describe and analyse the complexity of icebreaker operations, and its implications for practice. To thoroughly investigate this complexity, data are drawn from numerous sources; semi-structured interviews, a questionnaire, and a substantial amount of recorded authentic communication all provide complementary insights.

The results show that the icebreaker performs a multitude of tasks directly concerned with icebreaking, e.g. directing and physically assisting other vessels, but that these tasks indirectly rely on interpersonal interaction and communication. A number of conflicting constraints add to the complexity. For example, harsh winter conditions impede vessels’ independent navigation in ice, while offering icebreaker crews opportunities to practice and maintain important skills. Furthermore, it was shown that language skills and communication play an important role in upholding the operational safety. However, closed-loop communication is not always used as intended, a deviation from intended communication protocol with potential to increase the risk of misunderstandings.

This thesis suggests that safety and efficiency of winter navigation can be enhanced by making better use of existing technology and data; by examining the past track of other vessels, e.g. via AIS, finding suitable ice tracks will be made easier. Another implication concerning communication is that training institutes should emphasize the logic behind standardized communication protocols rather than focusing on standard phrases, i.e. facilitating means for advanced English speakers to adapt their communication style. That way, novice and advanced speakers could find common ground.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2020. p. 69
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 385/2020
Keywords
maritime safety, organization, human factors, closed-loop communication, Standard Marine Communication Phrases, misunderstanding, other-initiated repair
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Shipping, Maritime Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-95299 (URN)978-91-89081-63-5 (ISBN)978-91-89081-64-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-08-27, Ma135, Kalmar, 09:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-06-01 Created: 2020-06-01 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1085 kB)707 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1085 kBChecksum SHA-512
332a9099bf4f1898e1e70cae5ff049aea2f0d7985f040939f87646e26f32b1fb29726b2abe82653f23785a4613cabf188db17e59b73811b4efbf6bd4f395d1e6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Boström, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boström, Magnus
By organisation
Kalmar Maritime Academy
In the same journal
Cognition, Technology & Work
Work SciencesTransport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 711 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 620 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf