lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Contextualising the coevolution of (dis)trust and control: a longitudinal case study of a public market
Linköping University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3030-0314
Linköping University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1953-1325
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linköping University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0130-4407
2018 (English)In: Journal of Trust Research, ISSN 2151-5581, E-ISSN 2151-559X, Vol. 8, no 2, p. 192-219Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research into the dynamics of trust?control is still inconclusive. In this paper, we offer an in-depth understanding of how (dis)trust and control coevolve as embedded in multiple dimensions of context. The paper focuses on public markets, a context which is underrepresented in extant studies on trust and control. Our analysis is based on a longitudinal case study of interorganisational relationships (IOR) between boundary spanners representing purchaser and providers on a customer choice market for home care in a midsized municipality in Sweden. We identify, narrate and analyse critical incidents during seven years of the process. A conceptual framework contextualising the trust?control nexus of a public?private IOR is developed and utilised. We find that while the public?private IOR context requires control, control only enables deterrence trust from the municipal officers and only in individual providers. Interferential rather than symbiotic coevolution of trust and control is the dominating pattern. In addition, we find what we denote as mixed coevolution, where control simultaneously has positive and negative impact on trust. In our case in point, control enables trust in specific providers but this trust is not reciprocated due to experienced distrust on the category level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 8, no 2, p. 192-219
Keywords [en]
trust-control nexus, interorganisational relationships, context, customer choice market, boundary spanners, Sweden
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-77567DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2018.1504299Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85052114492OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-77567DiVA, id: diva2:1245216
Available from: 2018-09-04 Created: 2018-09-04 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Tillmar, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Högberg, LenaSköld, BirgittaTillmar, Malin
By organisation
Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship
In the same journal
Journal of Trust Research
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf