lnu.sePublications
4647484950515249 of 159
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fill-in-the-Blank or Write an Original Sentence: A Comparison of Practice Materials for Vocabulary Retention
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Languages.
2020 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Despite extensive research, a “best method” for teaching vocabulary has not been identified. The present study investigates the efficacy of two different practice materials for vocabulary retention, a fill-in-the-blank exercise and an original sentence writing exercise, from the hypothesis that a fill-in-the-blank exercise will be superior in terms of vocabulary retention on an immediate posttest. By testing this hypothesis, the study aims to contribute to the understanding of what is best practice in vocabulary teaching. The participants were 20 adult EFL learners studying at Basic Adult Education level. A controlled experiment using a Presentation, Practice, Production (PPP) structure was used. The cartoon public service announcement Dumb Ways to Die was used as the medium for presentation of twelve level and frequency scanned target nouns, followed by 10 minutes of practice time with either a fill-in-the-blank exercise or an original sentence writing exercise. Finally, an immediate posttest ensued. The result shows that the participants who practised using the fill-in-the-blank exercise performed better on the posttest, albeit not significantly better. In addition, further analysis indicates that some items of target vocabulary may have been previously known by the participants or easier to guess the meaning of. The pedagogical implications point towards using fill-in-the-blank exercises in the initial stages of vocabulary learning, after target vocabulary has been presented, while original sentence writing exercises appear better suited in later stages when more aspects of word knowledge have been acquired.     

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 34
Keywords [en]
Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention, Practice Materials, Adult EFL Learners, Fill-in-the-Blank
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-92925OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-92925DiVA, id: diva2:1414673
Subject / course
English
Educational program
Teacher Education Programme for Upper Secondary School, 300/330 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-03-17 Created: 2020-03-14 Last updated: 2020-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(950 kB)16 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 950 kBChecksum SHA-512
adf65fb623fd05cf7c2959e2928aac139c3e47133ba729fe1c1260906b269f5e5e155c585f10dea76d790a3c39be0394a3f51de38b7525d5e1b7b9e83eba87e6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Languages
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 16 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
4647484950515249 of 159
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf