lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The General Self-Efficacy Scale in a population planned for bariatric surgery in Sweden: a psychometric evaluation study
Örebro University, Sweden.
Örebro University, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics.
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden;Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 12, no 11, article id e061509Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Abstract [en]

Objectives This study psychometrically evaluated GeneralSelf-Efficacy (GSE) Scale in patients planned for bariatricsurgery in Sweden.Design A cross-sectional psychometric study. Thepsychometric evaluation was guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health statusMeasurement Instruments checklist for health-relatedreported-patient outcomes.Setting Three bariatric centres in Sweden.Participants Adult patients≥18 years old scheduled forprimary bariatric surgery (with sleeve gastrectomy orRoux-en-Y gastric bypass).Primary and secondary measures Psychometricproperties of the GSE.Results In total, 704 patients were included in theanalysis. Mean values for GSE items were 2.9–3.4 and themean GSE sum score was 31.4 (SD 4.7). There were nofloor or ceiling effects. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89. Menreported a higher mean GSE than did women, that is, 31.2(SD 4.8) for women versus 32.1 (SD 4.3) for men, p=0.03.Correlation coefficients were weak or negligible: GSE andmental component summary score of 36-Item Short FormHealth Survey (SF-36)/RAND 36, r=0.18 (p<0.00); GSEand physical component summary score of SF-36/RAND36, r=0.07 (p=0.138); GSE and obesity- related problemscale r=−0.15 (p=0.001) and GSE and level of education,r=0.04 (p=0.35). Confirmatory factor analysis indicateda one-factor construct with a satisfactory goodness of fit,that is, Comparative Fit Index=0.927, root mean squareerror of approximation=0.092 and standardised root meansquare residual=0.045. The factor GSE explained almosthalf or over half of the variance of each item (0.45–0.75,p-values<0.001).Conclusions The GSE scale is a valid and reliable scalethat can be used to assess general self-efficacy in patientsundergoing bariatric surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2022. Vol. 12, no 11, article id e061509
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Statistics/Econometrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-117339DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061509ISI: 000924532600018PubMedID: 36418126Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85142939104OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-117339DiVA, id: diva2:1709656
Available from: 2022-11-09 Created: 2022-11-09 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Liang, Yuli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liang, Yuli
By organisation
Department of Economics and Statistics
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf