This systematic living meta-review investigated presence of open science practices such as FAIR data adherence (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability), preregistration of protocols and reproducibility (e.g., searches) in educational systematic reviews through the years 2019-2023. Additionally, we assessed systematic reviews for adherence to methodological standards (Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (Wang et al., 2021), using the tool ROBIS—Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (Whiting et al., 2016). 

Results show that very few systematic reviews are assessed as low risk of bias, preregister a protocol, are possible to reproduce (e.g., searches and where exactly primary data is collected) and very few organize their data according to FAIR, although there are some reviews that adhere to the (much needed) rigorous standards and share data that can be reused. This poster will address these issues on how the community can improve reproducibility practices.