lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Big ideas, soft governance: managing large-scale school improvement at the national agency level in Sweden
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education and Teacher's Practice. (SITE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-6615
2024 (English)In: 10thNordic Curriculum TheoryConference: Abstracts, 2024, p. 6-7Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the Nordic curriculum theory tradition, questions linked to educational reforms and school governance have long been a crucial research issue (Lindensjö & Lundgren, 2000; Englund, 1986; Wahlström & Sundberg, 2018). The mainly focus in this tradition has over time been on the relationship between changed societal conditions and (trans-)national school policy and its implications for local school practice. However, less attention has been paid to the processes that occur between the national political decision level and the national school agency level. That is, national educational policy and state policy directives must often, in a first step, be interpreted and operationalized by a national school agency in more concrete school reforms and programs before they are implemented at the local schools.

In this study, the implementation of a national large-scale school improvement program in Sweden, “Collaboration for the best school as possible” (CBSP) has been used as an empirical case. Based on a neo-institutional theoretical point of departure (e.g. Scott, 2001, 2008) in combination of sense-making theory (e.g. Weick, 1995, 2001) this paper aims to explore the state governance of the CBSP and how officials at the state agency level made sense of the ideas behind the reform and operationalized them in policy actions. Officials of the Swedish National Agency for Education (SNAE) were interviewed. This interview data in combination of Swedish Government Official Reports and formal directives from the Ministry of Education were analyzed to identify how regulatory rules, professional norms and cultural–cognitive beliefs shaped SNAE’s design of the program. 

The results show how different types of governance logics (i.e. regulatory rules, professional norms and cultural–cognitive beliefs) set the direction for managing the CBSP. In particular, the lack of clear regulatory directives enabled Officials’ sensemaking processes, clearly influenced by normative ideas and cultural–cognitive beliefs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. p. 6-7
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Pedagogics and Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-133434OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-133434DiVA, id: diva2:1913913
Conference
10th Nordic Curriculum Theory Conference: Tightrope Walk between Fields and Forms of Knowledge, Oslo, Norway, 24-25 October, 2024
Available from: 2024-11-18 Created: 2024-11-18 Last updated: 2025-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://www.uv.uio.no/english/research/groups/cleg/events/2024/abstracts_nordic-curriculum-theory-conference-2024.pdf

Authority records

Adolfsson, Carl-Henrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Adolfsson, Carl-Henrik
By organisation
Department of Education and Teacher's Practice
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf