lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge management paradoxes
Växjö University, Faculty of Mathematics/Science/Technology, School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering. Informatik. (Informatik)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9632-0292
2008 (English)In: Proceedings of the 9th european conference on knowledge management: Southampton Solent University, UK 4-5 September, 2008, Academic Publising Limited , 2008, p. 10 (938)-Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Knowledge management, as an academic area, is maturing; however, there are still problems connected with both the diversity of the theoretical base and the gap between theory and its practical application. In this paper we tackle these problems by reviewing a number of basic knowledge management theories with the intention of formulating a more integrated and at the same time practical planning framework. The focus guiding the literature selection is on basic theories about the nature of knowledge management, theories that expose the complex nature of knowledge in organizations. We examine these theories and try to understand what could be perceived as the paradoxical nature of these theories. Here we understand a paradox as something seemingly self-contradictory though perhaps actually well-founded statement. We focus on four areas or themes: 1) knowledge as the key resource of a business, 2) knowledge as a competitive force and source of growth, 3) the nature of the management of a knowledge resource, and 4) the management of knowledge workers. From a practical point of view, the conflicting arguments of these theories can be seen as possible strategic options. Based on these discussions we then formulate a framework, or what might be called a strategic option generator. As a concluding discussion we focus on the contribution of IS/IT to the realization of the different possible strategic options. This is done on a rather general level, where we examine the possibilities of IS/IT in relation to the paradoxes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Academic Publising Limited , 2008. p. 10 (938)-
Research subject
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-3561ISBN: 978-906638-11-5 cd (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vxu-3561DiVA, id: diva2:203517
Available from: 2008-10-14 Created: 2008-10-14 Last updated: 2016-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Aidemark, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Aidemark, Jan
By organisation
School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 298 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf