lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The indirect approach of semi-focused groups: Expanding focus group research through role-playing
Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. (Entreprenörskapsprofilen)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7449-3301
2009 (English)In: Qualitative research in organization and management, ISSN 1746-5648, E-ISSN 1746-5656, Vol. 4, no 1, p. 7-26Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald , 2009. Vol. 4, no 1, p. 7-26
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Economy, Ledarskap, entreprenörskap och organisation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-6689OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vxu-6689DiVA, id: diva2:287031
Available from: 2010-01-16 Created: 2010-01-16 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Entrepreneurship at the limits
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Entrepreneurship at the limits
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This PhD dissertation is based on four published articles. It operates within the processual view of entrepreneurship studies (Steyaert, 1997), which draws on process philosophy to develop research strategies (Sørensen, 2005). The research has been guided by two strategies for understanding entrepreneurship: ‘moving’ (e.g. Steyaert and Hjorth, 2003) and ‘unveiling’ (e.g. Jones and Spicer, 2009). These strategies have so far been pursued largely in the conceptual domain, and this doctoral dissertation is an effort to take them a step further by combining empirical investigation and philosophical reflection. The aim is to investigate how a processual study of entrepreneurship ‘should be worked out’ in practice (Kristensen, Lopdrup-Hjorth and Sørensen, 2014).

The first two studies contribute an empirically informed conceptualisation of entrepreneurship, the first focused on how organisations are created, the second providing stories of emerging practices of female entrepreneurs. Though they aim to provide alternative conceptualisations, they remain firmly rooted in ‘traditional’ social science, offering alternative approaches to the dominant understandings of entrepreneurship, and utilizing accepted and traditional methodologies and theories. The last two papers are more experimental in their design. The aim is still to problematize discursive or practical aspects of entrepreneurship and processes around entrepreneurship, but also to investigate alternative methods for creating knowledge. The third study explores the somewhat paradoxical results of SME support schemes and develops a role-play-enhanced focus group technique. The fourth study is based on an organisational ethnography in antiquarian bookshops and experiments with fictional accounts and literary techniques as methods to generate knowledge.

The contribution of this dissertation to processual studies in entrepreneurship research is twofold. The first two papers are illustrations of an application of process concepts, while the last two papers illustrate the attempt to create process concepts. Taken together, the studies demonstrate how a processual study of entrepreneurship might be worked out in practice. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School [Phd], 2014. p. 171
Series
PhD Series, ISSN 0906-6934 ; 12.2014
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Economy, Ledarskap, entreprenörskap och organisation
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-51673 (URN)9788793155244 (ISBN)9788793155251 (ISBN)
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-04-05 Created: 2016-03-31 Last updated: 2016-04-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Bill, FredericOlaison, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bill, FredericOlaison, Lena
By organisation
School of Management and Economics
In the same journal
Qualitative research in organization and management
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf