lnu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of a dual treatment on myopia progression: the Cambridge anti-myopia study
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia ; University of Manchester, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: Ophthalmic & physiological optics, ISSN 0275-5408, E-ISSN 1475-1313, Vol. 33, nr 3, s. 267-276Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a dual treatment modality for myopia, by improving accommodative functions, on myopia progression.

METHODS: A double blind randomised control trial was conducted on 96 subjects. The treatment modality for the trial employed custom designed contact lenses which control spherical aberration in an attempt to optimise static accommodation responses during near-work, and a vision-training programme to improve accommodation dynamics. Myopia progression was assessed over a 2 year period using cycloplegic autorefraction and biometry.

RESULTS: The mean progression was found to be -0.33 Dioptres (D) over the 2 years of the study. There was no interaction between contact lens treatment and vision training treatment at 24 months (p = 0.72). There was no significant treatment effect of either Vision Training or Contact Lens Spherical Aberration control on myopia progression.

CONCLUSIONS: This study is unable to demonstrate that the progression of myopia can be reduced over a 2 year period by either of the two treatments aimed at improving accommodative function. Neither treatment group (contact lens or vision training) progressed at a slower rate over the 2 years of the study than did the appropriate control group.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 33, nr 3, s. 267-276
Nationell ämneskategori
Oftalmologi
Forskningsämne
Naturvetenskap, Optometri
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-44816DOI: 10.1111/opo.12035PubMedID: 23662960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-44816DiVA, id: diva2:823700
Tillgänglig från: 2015-06-18 Skapad: 2015-06-18 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-04Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Theagarayan, Baskar

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Theagarayan, Baskar
I samma tidskrift
Ophthalmic & physiological optics
Oftalmologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 476 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf