lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Botswana & Zimbabwe: En komparativ demokratiseringsstudie
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to shed light on why the democratic developments in Botswana and Zimbabwe, despite their many similarities, have gone in very different directions. By the time of their respective independence, both countries proclaimed themselves democratic states. However, only Botswana succeeded in the transition, while Zimbabwe soon fell back into an autocratic regime. The method used is a comparative case study. By comparing the cases Botswana and Zimbabwe in according to five selected democratic variables, this method makes it possible to explain why only Botswana succeeded. The research questions are: How have Botswana’s and Zimbabwe’s respective democratic transitions happened? What factors have influenced and guided the direction of the democratic development in Botswana and Zimbabwe? The following democratic variables will guide the comparison: “Economic development”, “Market economy”, “Strong middleclass”, “External influences” and “Political leaders dedicated to democracy”.

                The results show considerable differences between the democratic transitions of Botswana and Zimbabwe as regards all the selected democratic variables. The comparative method thus proved to be an effective tool to explain the democratic development in the two countries investigated in this case study. However, these factors potentially just scratch the surface and, in a theory-developing spirit, more democratic factors can broaden the explanation even more. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 34
Keywords [en]
Democratization, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Economic development, Market economy, Strong middleclass, External influences, Political leaders dedicated to democracy
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-60057OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-60057DiVA, id: diva2:1067562
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Program of Political Science, 180 credits
Examiners
Available from: 2017-02-02 Created: 2017-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(532 kB)211 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 532 kBChecksum SHA-512
32b1d60da63edd39a0eb14fe81fdc29a1e8c2d5ad672ee1f68e0bb8d22d64db637e2893906208ffffabb765268f37142bfcbdcc909ebff87b10584a582b29d7b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kungberg, Marcus
By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 211 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 693 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf