lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How can web-based training facilitate a more carer friendly practice in community-based health and social care services in Norway?: staff experiences and implementation challenges
University of Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger, Norway.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences. Swedish Family Care Competence Centre ; University of Sheffield, UK.
2017 (English)In: Health & Social Care in the Community, ISSN 0966-0410, E-ISSN 1365-2524, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 559-568Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It is a central feature of current Norwegian health and social care policyto see informal carers as active partners. However, research has revealedthat carers often experience a lack of recognition by professionals. In2010, the Norwegian Directorate of Health initiated a web-basedcompetence-building programme (CBP) for health and social carepractitioners aimed at facilitating collaboration with carers. Theprogramme comprised case presentations, e-lectures, exercises and topicsfor discussion, and was introduced in 2012. It was flexible and free ofcharge. This article is based on a study (2012–2013) that followed thepiloting of this CBP in four settings. The study aimed to explore factorsthat influenced the implementation of the programme and whether or notusing it affected health and social care practitioners’ attitudes andperceived capacity for collaboration with carers. The study employed amixed-methods design. A questionnaire was distributed to all staff beforeand 5 months after the CBP was introduced, followed by focus groupinterviews with a sample of staff members and individual interviewswith the leadership in the involved settings and those who introducedthe programme. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptivestatistics, which subsequently formed the basis for the focus groupinterviews. The qualitative data were analysed by means of contentanalysis. The programme’s introduction was similar across all researchsettings. Nevertheless, whether or not it was adopted depended to a largeextent on leadership commitment and engagement. In settings where theprogramme’s use was monitored, supported by management and formedpart of on-the-job training, there seemed to be a positive impact on staffattitudes concerning collaboration with carers. Participant staff reportedthat their awareness of, motivation for and confidence in collaborationwith carers were all strengthened. In contrast, the programme was ofminimal benefit in settings with low leadership engagement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2017. Vol. 25, no 2, p. 559-568
Keywords [en]
Carers, E-learning, Health and social care services, Leadership engagement, Mixed-methods
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-61516DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12343ISI: 000394976600025PubMedID: 26970403Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84960351552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-61516DiVA, id: diva2:1083418
Available from: 2017-03-21 Created: 2017-03-21 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hanson, Elizabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanson, Elizabeth
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring Sciences
In the same journal
Health & Social Care in the Community
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 79 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf