lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patient perceptions of a Virtual Health Room installation in rural Sweden
Umeå University.
Charles Darwin University, Australia.
Västerbotten Läns Landsting.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4108-391x
2016 (English)In: Rural and remote health, ISSN 1445-6354, Vol. 16, no 4, 3823Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The Virtual Health Room (VHR) is an ehealth initiative in the village of Slussfors in northern Sweden. Construction of VHRs in other locations is taking place, and the Centre for Rural Medicine in the Västerbotten County Council primary care department has implemented a VHR evaluation framework. This research focuses on evaluation of patient perceptions of the usability of the VHR and its contribution to their health care.

Methods: Nineteen of the 25 unique users of the VHR during 2014/15 completed a survey asking about their attitudes to their own health (using the 13-question version of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM)), their demographic attributes, and their satisfaction with their visit to the VHR.

Results: Respondents with lower PAM scores were less satisfied with the technical performance of the VHR, but equally likely to think the VHR made a good contribution to access to health care. In contrast, older patients were less likely to value the contribution of the VHR, but no less likely to be satisfied with its technical performance. There were no relationships between level of education and distance travelled and perceptions of the VHR.

Conclusions: The research clearly demonstrated the distinction between technical performance of an ehealth initiative and its overall contribution to health care and access. Evaluation frameworks need to consider both aspects of performance. Transferability of these findings to other settings may depend at least in part on the nature of the catchment area for the VHR, with the Slussfors catchment being quite small and the impact of distance on access consequently limited.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ARHEN - Australian Rural Health Education Network Ltd , 2016. Vol. 16, no 4, 3823
Keyword [en]
Ehealth evaluation, Patient activation measure, Sweden, Virtual health room
National Category
Other Medical Sciences
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Health Informatics; Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-62904ISI: 000396697000007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85009738193OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-62904DiVA: diva2:1095043
Available from: 2017-02-09 Created: 2017-05-11 Last updated: 2017-05-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

ScopusFulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekstedt, Mirjam
In the same journal
Rural and remote health
Other Medical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 79 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf