lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Supply chain management integration: a critical analysis
University of North Florida, USA ; Lund University.
Lund University.
2012 (English)In: Benchmarking: An International Journal, ISSN 1463-5771, E-ISSN 1758-4094, Vol. 19, no 4/5, 481-501 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

The purpose is to examine various aspects of integration in order to structure and define the concept of supply chain management integration.

Design/methodology/approach

The study is based on an extensive literature review in three steps and a series of interviews with leading SCM consulting firms.

Findings

We found limited empirical research discussing SCM integration beyond the dyadic level and there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting the claimed benefits of supply chain management integration, especially beyond the dyadic level. There is also a lack of detailed frameworks and concrete recommendations for how supply chains can become more integrated. In fact, there is significant confusion regarding the term SCM integration and thus we propose a definition of Supply Chain Management Integration.

Research limitations/implications

In terms of limitations, it is feasible that an extended literature review could have provided additional information. Similarly, additional interviews would have been preferable, yet given the level of expertise; and the access granted, we believe the current number of respondents is sufficient.

Practical implications

Our findings, and our effort to structure and define the term supply chain management integration, can facilitate organizational developments in this area.

Originality/value

Academic literature suggests that integration is a requirement for Supply Chain Management. However, integrated supply chain management is difficult to define and it seems hard to operationalize in practice. One could also argue that there has been a significant amount of hype regarding the potential as well as the results of SCM integration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 19, no 4/5, 481-501 p.
Keyword [en]
Supply chain management, integration, information sharing, collaboration
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Economy, Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-64892DOI: 10.1108/14635771211257963OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-64892DiVA: diva2:1106228
Available from: 2017-06-07 Created: 2017-06-07 Last updated: 2017-09-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On understanding of external and internal integration in supply chains: challenges and evaluation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On understanding of external and internal integration in supply chains: challenges and evaluation
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Benefits of implementing Supply Chain Integration (SCI) are acknowledged in existing integration literature. Integration extending beyond functional silos and firm boundaries is expected to provide value for customers in terms of higher quality, improved service level, and reduced costs.In addition, internal integration allows business functions to align around a single company goal. This type of integration promotes value creation while decreasing redundancies and costs.

Yet, regardless of the significant advances in research and practice, many organizations still experience difficulties not only to integrate activities with supply chain partners, but they also struggle to integrate activities within an organization, for example, through implementation of a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process.

To tackle these challenges, organizations may need to reconsider why and how they integrate both internally and externally. However, the previous integration research provides only limited guidelines for how to carry out such evaluations. Many organizations experience difficulties in addressing the complexity related to integration and evaluation of activities internally and with SC partners. The lack of concrete guidelines for evaluation of SCI in theory is seen as one of the reasons for the still sporadic examples of successful SCI in practice.

Thus, the overall purpose of this research is to increase understanding of external and internal integration in supply chains. To address the purpose, three studies (1-3) have been conducted. The study 1 highlighted the current status and several SCI challenges in academic literature and in practice. One of the major challenges relates to the absence of a systematic comprehensive approach for evaluation of internal and external integration. To contribute to closing of this gap, study 2 was conducted to develop a context based framework for evaluation of external integration. Finally, the subsequent study 3 aimed to develop a framework for evaluation of the S&OP process.

Concerning the SCI challenges, this research contributes to previous integration literature by confirming some existing challenges but also by identifying additional challenges. Related to challenges of external integration, a set of contextual factors are identified which were observed to challenge the establishment of an appropriate level of external integration with SC partners. As a result a misfit occurs between the contextual factors and applied level of external integration. Additionally, reasons for the misfits were identified and discussed.

Associated with the challenges of S&OP process, this thesis adds to existing fragmented literature on the S&OP process evaluation challenges by synthesizing and extending the existing knowledge. A framework has been developed which is founded on two key areas of process performance – S&OP process effectiveness and efficiency, and on various maturity levels of the process. Although several challenges were found for each maturity level, some challenges were observed occurring across more levels.

Moreover, in this research, a context based framework for evaluation of external integration is proposed. The framework extends the previous SCI frameworks. It is founded on contextual factors which were considered by the studied cases when integrating with their SC partners. Furthermore, the factors were observed to promote establishment of an appropriate level of external integration. Each level consists of identified external integration activities.

The thesis further contributes to the S&OP performance research by addressing the lack of process oriented frameworks for evaluation of the process performance. The proposed framework of measuring the S&OP process performance considers the five major steps of the process and their outputs as well as the output of the entire process. To reflect the process performance measures, the framework structures and defines effectiveness and efficiency measures and their relation to the process performance. The framework also conforms to the majority of the criteria for designing of appropriate performance measures.

Finally, the major results of the thesis are synthesized and a framework is suggested of external integration and its effect on S&OP process performance. The framework considers the identified contextual factors, appropriate levels of external integration, and the S&OP performance measures the integration can have effect on. The thesis also discusses, alongside with the theoretical contributions, how the developed frameworks can support managers in evaluating their supply chain integration practices. Additionally, several opportunities for future research are outlined.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund: Lund University, 2016. 274 p.
Keyword
Supply chain integration, contextual factors, sales and operations planning process, S&OP process, performance measures
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Economy, Logistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-64925 (URN)978-91-7623-934-6 (ISBN)978-91-7623-935-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-10-21, Ole Römers väg 1, Lund, 16:31 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-06-09 Created: 2017-06-07 Last updated: 2017-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hulthén, Hana
In the same journal
Benchmarking: An International Journal
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf