lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adherence to risk management guidelines for drugs which cause vitamin D deficiency – big data from the Swedish health system
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry. Region Kalmar County, Sweden. (Ctr Data Intens Sci & Applicat, DISA;DISA-IDP)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2149-8998
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences.
County Hospital Kalmar, Sweden;Linköping university, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry. County Hospital Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0463-8568
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, E-ISSN 1179-1365, Vol. 11, p. 19-28Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Several medications are known to cause vitamin D deficiency. The aim of this study is to describe vitamin D testing and supplementation in patients using these “risk medications”, thereby assessing adherence to medical guidelines.Patients and methods: A database with electronic health records for the population in a Swedish County (≈240,000 inhabitants) was screened for patients prescribed the pre-defined “risk medications” during a 2-year period (2014–2015). In total, 12,194 patients were prescribed “risk medications” pertaining to one of the three included pharmaceutical groups. Vitamin D testing and concomitant vitamin D supplementation, including differences between the included pharmaceutical groups, was explored by matching personal identification numbers.Results: Corticosteroids were prescribed to 10,003 of the patients, antiepileptic drugs to 1,101, and drugs mainly reducing vitamin D uptake to 864. Two hundred twenty-six patients were prescribed >1 “risk medication”. Seven hundred eighty-seven patients (6.5%) had been tested during the 2-year period. There were no differences regarding testing frequency between groups. Concomitant supplements were prescribed to 3,911 patients (32.1%). It was more common to be prescribed supplements when treated with corticosteroids. Vitamin D supplementation was more common among tested patients in all three groups. Women were tested and supplemented to a higher extent. The mean vitamin D level was 69 nmol/L. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 24.1% of tested patients, while 41.3% had optimal levels. It was less common to be deficient and more common to have optimal levels among patients prescribed corticosteroids.Conclusion: Adherence to medical guidelines comprising testing and supplementation of patients prescribed drugs causing vitamin D deficiency needs improvement in Sweden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dove Medical Press Ltd , 2019. Vol. 11, p. 19-28
National Category
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Research subject
Biomedical Sciences, Pharmacology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-81355DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S188187ISI: 000462173500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85073038615OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-81355DiVA, id: diva2:1299673
Available from: 2019-03-28 Created: 2019-03-28 Last updated: 2024-01-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Epidemiological aspects of drug-related vitamin D deficiency and osteoporotic fractures
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Epidemiological aspects of drug-related vitamin D deficiency and osteoporotic fractures
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: Vitamin D deficiency, secondary osteoporosis and low-energy fractures (LEF) as side effects of specific drugs were first described more than half a century ago. These effects are recognized in guidelines where patients prescribed risk drugs are recommended follow-up with testing and supplementation. How these drugs are managed within Swedish healthcare has not been previously investigated. 

Aim: To study epidemiological aspects of drug-related vitamin D deficiency and osteoporotic fractures.

Methods: The association between drugs for continual use and vitamin D levels in the elderly was investigated in a clinical study including more than 550 patients (paper I). Real-world data on drug prescriptions, laboratory testing and demographic variables from electronic health records were thereafter used to assess the clinical management and vitamin D levels. More than 12 000 patients prescribed risk drugs were included in this cross-sectional study (paper II). Focus group interviews were then undertaken to explore determinants of risk drug management among physicians from seven primary care centers. Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to create a framework addressing adherence to medical guidelines (paper III). Finally, a multifactorial risk assessment tool was developed from LEF risk factors in more than    15 000 patients prescribed antiepileptic risk drugs in a retrospective open cohort study (paper IV).

Results: A weak inverse association between the number of prescribed drugs and levels of vitamin D was found (paper I). Fewer than one in fifteen patients prescribed risk drugs were tested for vitamin D while close to a third were supplemented. Differences in management and vitamin D levels with regard to type of risk drug were found (paper II). Awareness levels, expressed beliefs and perceived responsibility were reasons behind these differences (paper III). The Kalmar Epilepsy Fracture Risk Index (KEFRI) confirmed previously suggested risk factors (paper IV). 

Conclusions: Drugs generating vitamin D deficiency, secondary osteoporosis and LEF are often overlooked in healthcare. Awareness and attitudes need to be improved and strategies to better manage patients prescribed these drugs are required in order to avoid unnecessary side effects. The KEFRI could aid clinicians in treatment decisions, potentially reducing fracture risks in specific patient groups. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2022. p. 51
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 466/2022
Keywords
vitamin D, secondary osteoporosis, fractures, drug risk management, medical guideline adherence, electronic health records, real-world data, risk assessment, awareness, attitudes, personalised medicine, cross-sectional study, cohort study, qualitative analysis, thematic analysis, pharmacoepidemiology
National Category
Social and Clinical Pharmacy
Research subject
Natural Science, Biomedical Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-116844 (URN)10.15626/LUD.466.2022 (DOI)9789189709430 (ISBN)9789189709447 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-11-11, Aula Sienna, Universitetsplatsen 1, Kalmar, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
The Kamprad Family FoundationMedical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS)
Available from: 2022-10-13 Created: 2022-10-12 Last updated: 2024-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nordqvist, OlaWanby, PärCarlsson, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordqvist, OlaLönnbom Svensson, UlrikaWanby, PärCarlsson, Martin
By organisation
Department of Medicine and OptometryDepartment of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences
In the same journal
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Pharmaceutical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 207 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf