lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The innovation and performance effects of well-designed environmental regulation: evidence from Sweden
Jönköping University, Sweden;Univ Bergamo, Italy.
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Marketing. Univ Bergamo, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3325-1482
2019 (English)In: Industry and Innovation, ISSN 1366-2716, E-ISSN 1469-8390, Vol. 26, no 5, p. 534-567Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper provides novel empirical insights into the Porter hypothesis (PH) and its dynamic nature. The PH posits that well-designed environmental regulations induce eco-innovations at polluting firms that improve both their environmental and business performance via 'innovation offsets.' We conduct an econometric test of this proposition, using Swedish pulp and paper plants as empirical application. Swedish environmental regulation of polluting industries provides an interesting case because it has been praised, due to containing elements of 'well-designed' regulations, for being conducive to accomplishing the 'win-win' situation of mutual environmental and economic benefits. The empirical results indicate that flexible and dynamic command-and-control regulation and economic incentive instruments have induced innovation offsets through improved energy efficiency. Our study bears important implications: empirical tests of the PH that do not account for its dynamic nature, and that do not measure 'well-designed' regulations, might provide misleading conclusions as to its validity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2019. Vol. 26, no 5, p. 534-567
Keywords [en]
Porter hypothesis, well-designed regulation, command-and-control, economic instruments, polluting industries, innovation offsets, win-win, double dividend
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-82410DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1468240ISI: 000464579000003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046453498OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-82410DiVA, id: diva2:1313375
Available from: 2019-05-03 Created: 2019-05-03 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Anisimova, Tatiana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Anisimova, Tatiana
By organisation
Department of Marketing
In the same journal
Industry and Innovation
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf