lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Flexibility of habitat use in novel environments: insights from a translocation experiment with lesser black-backed gulls
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany;University of Konstanz, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2254-5779
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany;Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany;University of Bangor, UK.
University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Royal Society Open Science, E-ISSN 2054-5703, Vol. 4, no 1, p. 1-14, article id 160164Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Being faced with unknown environments is a concomitant challenge of species' range expansions. Strategies to cope with this challenge include the adaptation to local conditions and a flexibility in resource exploitation. The gulls of the Larus argentatus-fuscus-cachinnans group form a system in which ecological flexibility might have enabled them to expand their range considerably, and to colonize urban environments. However, on a population level both flexibility and local adaptation lead to signatures of differential habitat use in different environments, and these processes are not easily distinguished. Using the lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus) as a system, we put both flexibility and local adaptation to a test. We compare habitat use between two spatially separated populations, and use a translocation experiment during which individuals were released into novel environment. The experiment revealed that on a population-level flexibility best explains the differences in habitat use between the two populations. We think that our results suggest that the range expansion and huge success of this species complex could be a result of its broad ecological niche and flexibility in the exploitation of resources. However, this also advises caution when using species distribution models to extrapolate habitat use across space.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Royal Society , 2017. Vol. 4, no 1, p. 1-14, article id 160164
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Natural Science, Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-93319DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160164OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-93319DiVA, id: diva2:1422522
Note

Original tracking data are available from the Movebank Data Repository (http://www.datarepository.movebank.org) under (http://dx.doi.org/10.5441/001/1.q986rc29)

Available from: 2020-04-08 Created: 2020-04-08 Last updated: 2020-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

van Toor, Mariëlle L.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Toor, Mariëlle L.
In the same journal
Royal Society Open Science
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf