lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation
Univ Bern, Switzerland.
Penn State Univ, USA.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. (Ctr Ecol & Evolut Microbial Model Syst EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9598-7618
Max Planck Inst Ornithol, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience, ISSN 1471-003X, E-ISSN 1471-0048, Vol. 21, p. 384-393Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this Perspective, Hanno Wurbel and colleagues argue that a disregard for incorporating biological variation in study design is an important cause of poor reproducibility in animal research. They put the case for the use of systematic heterogenization of study samples and conditions in studies to improve reproducibility.

Context-dependent biological variation presents a unique challenge to the reproducibility of results in experimental animal research, because organisms' responses to experimental treatments can vary with both genotype and environmental conditions. In March 2019, experts in animal biology, experimental design and statistics convened in Blonay, Switzerland, to discuss strategies addressing this challenge. In contrast to the current gold standard of rigorous standardization in experimental animal research, we recommend the use of systematic heterogenization of study samples and conditions by actively incorporating biological variation into study design through diversifying study samples and conditions. Here we provide the scientific rationale for this approach in the hope that researchers, regulators, funders and editors can embrace this paradigm shift. We also present a road map towards better practices in view of improving the reproducibility of animal research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Publishing Group, 2020. Vol. 21, p. 384-393
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Natural Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-97088DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3ISI: 000537344600001PubMedID: 32488205Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85085940380OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-97088DiVA, id: diva2:1453255
Note

Correction published in: Nat Rev Neurosci 21, 394 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0326-y

Available from: 2020-07-09 Created: 2020-07-09 Last updated: 2021-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Forsman, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsman, AndersGurevitch, JessicaKarp, Natasha A.Kas, Martien J.
By organisation
Department of Biology and Environmental Science
In the same journal
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf