Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Flodén ATODAI instrument in the North American contextShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 19, no 1, p. 1-8, article id 55Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background Intensive and critical-care nurses are the key to successful donor management in the critical-care setting. No studies measuring attitudes toward organ donor advocacy existed before 2011, when the 51-item Swedish "Attitudes Toward Organ Donor Advocacy Scale" was developed. The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and establish the psychometric properties of the North American version of the Floden ATODAI (Attitudes Toward Organ Donor Advocacy Instrument) in terms of validity and reliability. Methods A multi-step approach was used: Initial translation; Back-translation; Review and synthesis of these translations;Expert panel(N = 7) rated the prefinal version of the instrument for content validity index (CVI);International panelmade adjustments guided by theexpert panel. Reliability testing with test and retest of the adjusted 46-item version was conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), weighted kappa (& x4a1;(Weight)), sign test, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient (alpha), (N = 50); and finally Delphi technique procedure with a preselectedDelphi panel(N = 15). Results The CVI was determined to be greater than the 0.05 significance level. Item level (I-CVI) ranged 0.82-1.0, with a mean of 0.97. Scale level (S-CVI) on the entire instrument was 0.97. Test-retest procedure was performed to estimate stability. In total, 34 of the items had good-to-high ICC. Accepting an ICC of >= 0.70 resulted in a total of 24 items. Homogeneity reliability was estimated by alpha and was calculated for these items where alpha = 0.90. In total, 20 of the items had a substantial or almost perfect & x4a1;(Weight)and 23 showed a moderate & x4a1;(Weight). None of the items showed systematical differences. The Delphi technique procedure was used on the 22 items with ICC < 0.70 resulted in adjustments establishing that consensus was achieved. Conclusions Undertaking this multi-step, cross-cultural adaptation procedure has effectively ensured that the 46-item Floden ATODAI [North American version] produces valid and reliable measurements.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2020. Vol. 19, no 1, p. 1-8, article id 55
Keywords [en]
Instrument development, Translation and cross-cultural adaptation, Advocacy, Attitude, Organ donation, Nursing, Intensive care
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-97217DOI: 10.1186/s12912-020-00444-8ISI: 000543526800001PubMedID: 32581648Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85092468268OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-97217DiVA, id: diva2:1454521
2020-07-172020-07-172024-07-04Bibliographically approved