lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for diagnosing colorectal cancer in patients with histories of rectal bleeding in primary care: a cohort study
Umeå University, Sweden.
Umeå University, Sweden.
Lund University, Sweden;Region Kronoberg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3300-8255
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry. Lund University, Sweden;Region Kronoberg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3785-5630
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: International Journal of Colorectal Disease, ISSN 0179-1958, E-ISSN 1432-1262, Vol. 35, p. 2035-2040Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Rectal bleeding is considered an alarm symptom for colorectal cancer (CRC) but it is common and mostly caused by benign conditions. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for occult blood have been used as diagnostic aids for many years in Sweden when CRC is suspected. The study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of FITs requested by primary care physicians for patients with and without histories of rectal bleeding, in the diagnosis of CRC. Methods Results of all FITs requested in primary care for symptomatic patients in the orebro region during 2015 were retrieved. Data on each patient's history of rectal bleeding was gathered from electronic health records. Patients diagnosed with CRC within 2 years were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register. The analysis focused on three-sample FITs, the customary FIT in Sweden. Results A total of 4232 patients provided three-sample FITs. Information about the presence/absence of rectal bleeding was available for 2027 patients, of which 59 were diagnosed with CRC. For 606 patients with the presence of rectal bleeding, the FIT showed sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 60.2%, positive predictive value 9.8% (95% CI 6.1-13.4) and negative predictive value 99.7% (95% CI 99.2-100) for CRC. For 1421 patients without rectal bleeding, the corresponding figures were 100%, 73.6%, 8.3% (95% CI 5.6-10.9) and 100% (95% CI 99.6-100). Conclusion The diagnostic performance of a qualitative three-sample FIT provided by symptomatic patients in primary care was similar for those with and without a history of rectal bleeding. FITs seem useful for prioritising patients also with rectal bleeding for further investigation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 35, p. 2035-2040
Keywords [en]
Colorectal neoplasms, Occult blood, Faecal immunochemical tests, Primary health care, Rectal bleeding
National Category
Clinical Laboratory Medicine Cancer and Oncology
Research subject
Natural Science, Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-97215DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03672-1ISI: 000544184800001PubMedID: 32602056Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087126851OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-97215DiVA, id: diva2:1454527
Available from: 2020-07-17 Created: 2020-07-17 Last updated: 2022-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Thulesius, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cronberg, OlofThulesius, Hans
By organisation
Department of Medicine and Optometry
In the same journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Clinical Laboratory MedicineCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf