lnu.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Four-Field Co-evolutionary Model for Human Cognition: Variation in the Middle Stone Age/Middle Palaeolithic
Univ Johannesburg, South Africa;Stellenbosch Univ, South Africa.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Cultural Sciences. Univ Johannesburg, South Africa;Stellenbosch Univ, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8747-4131
2021 (English)In: Journal of archaeological method and theory, ISSN 1072-5369, E-ISSN 1573-7764, Vol. 28, no 1, p. 142-177Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
Not refering to any SDG
Abstract [en]

Here we explore variation and similarities in the two best-represented population groups who lived during the Middle Stone Age and Middle Palaeolithic-the Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Building on approaches such as gene-culture co-evolution, we propose a four-field model to discuss relationships between human cognitive evolution, biology, technology, society, and ecology. We focus on the pre-50-ka phase, because we reason that later admixing between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens in Eurasia may make it difficult to separate them in terms of cognition, or any of the other fields discussed in this paper. Using our model enabled us to highlight similarities in cognition between the two populations in terms of symbolic behaviour and social learning and to identify differences in aspects of technical and social cognition. Dissimilarities in brain-selective gene variants and brain morphology strongly suggest differences in some evolutionary trajectories that would have affected cognition. We therefore suggest that rather than insisting that Neanderthals were cognitively 'the same' as Homo sapiens, it may be useful to focus future studies on Neanderthal-specific cognition that may have been well-developed within their specific context at the time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2021. Vol. 28, no 1, p. 142-177
Keywords [en]
Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, Palaeoneurology, Ancient-DNA, Causal cognition, Social learning, Technical innovation
National Category
Archaeology
Research subject
Humanities, Archaeology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-100667DOI: 10.1007/s10816-020-09502-6ISI: 000605541900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099199490Local ID: 2021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-100667DiVA, id: diva2:1523330
Available from: 2021-01-28 Created: 2021-01-28 Last updated: 2022-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Högberg, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Högberg, Anders
By organisation
Department of Cultural Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of archaeological method and theory
Archaeology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf