lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A relational perspective on the association between working alliance and treatment outcome
Linköping University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Sweden;Stockholm University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2486-6859
2020 (English)In: Psychotherapy Research, ISSN 1050-3307, E-ISSN 1468-4381, Vol. 30, no 1, p. 13-22Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Evidence is inconclusive on whether variability in alliance ratings within or between therapists is a better predictor of treatment outcome. The objective of the present study was to explore between and within patient and therapist variability in alliance ratings, reciprocity among them, and their significance for treatment outcome. Method: A large primary care psychotherapy sample was used. Patient and therapist ratings of the working alliance at session three and patient ratings of psychological distress pre-post were used for analyses. A one-with-many analytical design was used in order to address problems associated with nonindependence. Results: Within-therapist variation in alliance ratings accounted for larger shares of the total variance than between-therapist variation in both therapist and patient ratings. Associations between averaged patient and therapist ratings of the alliance for the individual therapists and their average treatment outcome were weak but the associations between specific alliance ratings and treatment outcome within therapies were strong. Conclusions: The results indicated a substantial dyadic reciprocity in alliance ratings. Within-therapist variation in alliance was a better predictor of treatment outcome than between-therapist variation in alliance ratings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2020. Vol. 30, no 1, p. 13-22
Keywords [en]
Adult, Behavioral Symptoms/*therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/*statistics & numerical data, Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data, *Psychological Distress, Psychotherapists/*statistics & numerical data, Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic/statistics & numerical data, Sweden, *Therapeutic Alliance, *Alliance, *outcome Research, *process Research, *statistical methodology
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Social Sciences, Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-102479DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1516306OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-102479DiVA, id: diva2:1548646
Available from: 2021-05-03 Created: 2021-05-03 Last updated: 2021-11-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Falkenström, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkenström, Fredrik
In the same journal
Psychotherapy Research
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf