lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales
University of Gothenburg, Sweden;Jönköping University, Sweden.
LMU Munich, Germany;Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Germany;ICF Research Branch, Switzerland.
Jönköping University, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, E-ISSN 2509-8020, Vol. 4, no 1, article id 7Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the importance of person-centered care has led to increased interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In cardiovascular care, selecting an appropriate PROM for clinical use or research is challenging because multimorbidity is often common in patients. The aim was therefore to provide an overview of heart-disease specific PROMs and to compare the content of those outcomes using a bio-psycho-social framework of health.

METHODS: A scoping review of heart disease-specific PROMs, including arrhythmia/atrial fibrillation, congenital heart disease, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and valve diseases was conducted in PubMed (January 2018). All items contained in the disease-specific PROMs were mapped to WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) according to standardized linking rules.

RESULTS: A total of 34 PROMs (heart diseases in general n = 5; cardiac arrhythmia n = 6; heart failure n = 14; ischemic heart disease n = 9) and 147 ICF categories were identified. ICF categories covered Body functions (n = 61), Activities & Participation (n = 69), and Environmental factors (n = 17). Most items were about experienced problems of Body functions and less often about patients' daily activities, and most PROMs were specifically developed for heart failure and no PROM were identified for valve disease or congenital heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results motivate and provide information to develop comprehensive PROMs that consider activity and participation by patients with various types of heart disease.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 4, no 1, article id 7
Keywords [en]
Healthcare quality, Patient outcome assessment, Heart disease, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Patient-reported outcome measures, Person-centered, Review
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-102681DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0165-7ISI: 000705287700001PubMedID: 31974688Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078179151Local ID: 2020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-102681DiVA, id: diva2:1552532
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05 Last updated: 2024-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fridlund, BengtÅrestedt, Kristofer

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fridlund, BengtÅrestedt, Kristofer
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring SciencesSustainable Health
In the same journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 105 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf