lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing heuristic methods' performance for pure flow shop scheduling under certain and uncertain demand
Univ Bunda Mulia, Indonesia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4528-2465
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics. Univ Bunda Mulia, Indonesia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6402-3178
Univ Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia.
2020 (English)In: Management and Production Engineering Review, ISSN 2080-8208, E-ISSN 2082-1344, Vol. 11, no 2, p. 50-61Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The main aim of this research is to compare the results of the study of demand's plan and standardized time based on three heuristic scheduling methods such as Campbell Dudek Smith (CDS), Palmer, and Dannenbring. This paper minimizes the makespan under certain and uncertain demand for domestic boxes at the leading glass company industry in Indonesia. The investigation is run in a department called Preparation Box (later simply called PRP) which experiences tardiness while meeting the requirement of domestic demand. The effect of tardiness leads to unfulfilled domestic demand and hampers the production department delivers goods to the customer on time. PRP needs to consider demand planning for the next period under the certain and uncertain demand plot using the forecasting and Monte Carlo simulation technique. This research also utilizes a work sampling method to calculate the standardized time, which is calculated by considering the performance rating and allowance factor. This paper contributes to showing a comparison between three heuristic scheduling methods performances regarding a real-life problem. This paper concludes that the Dannenbring method is suitable for large domestic boxes under certain demand while Palmer and Dannenbring methods are suitable for large domestic boxes under uncertain demand. The CDS method is suitable to prepare small domestic boxes for both certain and uncertain demand.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Polish Academy of Science , 2020. Vol. 11, no 2, p. 50-61
Keywords [en]
Forecasting, Monte Carlo simulation, standardized time, heuristic scheduling methods
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-103171DOI: 10.24425/mper.2020.133728ISI: 000546178700005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089196084OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-103171DiVA, id: diva2:1554062
Available from: 2021-05-11 Created: 2021-05-11 Last updated: 2025-02-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jayadi, Ester Lisnati

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nurprihatin, FilschaJayadi, Ester Lisnati
By organisation
Department of Management Accounting and Logistics
In the same journal
Management and Production Engineering Review
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 105 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf