lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Empirical Study: Visual Analytics for Comparing Stacking to Blending Ensemble Learning
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM). (ISOVIS;DISA)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9079-2376
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM). (ISOVIS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2901-935X
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM). (ISOVIS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1907-7820
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM). Linköping University, Sweden. (ISOVIS;DISA)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0519-2537
2021 (English)In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS23), 26–28 May 2021, Bucharest, Romania / [ed] Ioan Dumitrache, Adina Magda Florea, Mihnea-Alexandru Moisescu, Florin Pop, and Alexandru Dumitraşcu, IEEE, 2021, p. 1-8Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Stacked generalization (also called stacking) is an ensemble method in machine learning that uses a metamodel to combine the predictive results of heterogeneous base models arranged in at least one layer. K-fold cross-validation is employed at the various stages of training in this method. Nonetheless, another validation strategy is to try out several splits of data leading to different train and test sets for the base models and then use only the latter to train the metamodel—this is known as blending. In this work, we present a modification of an existing visual analytics system, entitled StackGenVis, that now supports the process of composing robust and diverse ensembles of models with both aforementioned methods. We have built multiple ensembles using our system with the two respective methods, and we tested the performance with six small- to large-sized data sets. The results indicate that stacking is significantly more powerful than blending based on three performance metrics. However, the training times of the base models and the final ensembles are lower and more stable during various train/test splits in blending rather than stacking.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2021. p. 1-8
Keywords [en]
Stacking, blending, ensemble learning, machine learning, visual analytics, visualization, empirical study
National Category
Computer Sciences
Research subject
Computer Science, Information and software visualization
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-106084DOI: 10.1109/CSCS52396.2021.00008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85112033363ISBN: 9781665439404 (print)ISBN: 9781665439398 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-106084DiVA, id: diva2:1582824
Conference
The 23rd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS23), online conference, 26-28 May, 2021
Funder
ELLIIT - The Linköping‐Lund Initiative on IT and Mobile Communications
Note

Invited Paper

Available from: 2021-08-04 Created: 2021-08-04 Last updated: 2022-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Chatzimparmpas, AngelosMartins, Rafael MessiasKucher, KostiantynKerren, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chatzimparmpas, AngelosMartins, Rafael MessiasKucher, KostiantynKerren, Andreas
By organisation
Department of computer science and media technology (CM)
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 193 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf