lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding drivers and barriers affecting tourists' engagement in digitally mediated pro-sustainability boycotts
Univ Oulu, Finland.
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics. Univ Oulu, Finland;Univ Canterbury, New Zealand;Univ Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7734-4587
Univ Oulu, Finland.
Excelia Business Sch, France;CEREGE, France.
2023 (English)In: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, ISSN 0966-9582, E-ISSN 1747-7646, Vol. 31, no 11, p. 2526-2545Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
SDG 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Abstract [en]

Despite the growing body of research on consumer activism, little is understood about tourists' digitally mediated boycott consumption behaviours in relation to pro-sustainability concerns. Drawing upon research grounded in political consumerism and consumer sustainability behaviour and through a constructivist grounded theory lens via a series of semi-structured interviews, this study set out to fill this gap. Two main themes emerged from the analysis of the interviews: drivers of boycott participation (including self-enhancement, perceived egregiousness, creating change, awareness and personal proximity to the boycott cause) and the barriers to boycott participation (which include counterarguments, ineffectiveness and free-riding). The findings elucidate the vital role of digitally mediated activism in contemporary ethical tourism discourses and reveal that different digital media technologies act as both information sources and mediators of boycott decision-making when it comes to targeting perceived unethical practices. Furthermore, in contrast to how tourists' boycotts are traditionally viewed, the results of this study suggest that participation in sustainability-related boycotting occurs as a process-based continuous practice instead of a one-time boycott participation. Overall, this study provides a deeper understanding of tourists' boycott behavior in the digital age and offers implications for tourism destinations and businesses subjected to boycott targets and upstream social marketing. As a result the article provides significant avenues for further research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2023. Vol. 31, no 11, p. 2526-2545
Keywords [en]
Consumer activism, pro-sustainability, tourism boycott, digital activism, political consumerism, social marketing, sustainable tourism
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Tourism Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-109660DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2021.2013489ISI: 000730474700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85121500318OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-109660DiVA, id: diva2:1630627
Available from: 2022-01-20 Created: 2022-01-20 Last updated: 2025-01-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hall, C. Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hall, C. Michael
By organisation
School of Business and Economics
In the same journal
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf