lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Students' Role in Standards-Based Education: Critical Reflections on Pedagogical Implications
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education and Teacher's Practice. Linnaeus University, Linnaeus Knowledge Environments, Education in Change. (SITE)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7912-8776
2022 (English)In: Equity, Teaching Practice and the Curriculum: Exploring Differences in Access to Knowledge / [ed] Ninni Wahlström, Oxon: Routledge, 2022, p. 60-75Chapter in book (Other academic)
Sustainable development
SDG 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Abstract [en]

In this chapter, the focus is on students as co-authors of curriculum events in differing classroom contexts. The purpose of the chapter is to shed light on the pedagogical implications of a standards-based curriculum in relation to those groups of actors in the school system who are at the centre of all educational efforts and whose broad intellectual, personal and social development the curriculum ultimately addresses. The primary questions in this chapter are how the students’ role as co-authors can be understood and what this role means in educational processes when the standards-based curriculum, intending to enable equal conditions for teaching and learning, is enacted in different kinds of classrooms. Theoretically, the chapter is located at the interface where pedagogy, curriculum and bildungs-oriented Didaktik meet. A conceptual apparatus that mainly builds upon Klafki’s critical-constructive Didaktik provides the theoretical framework through which the students’ role can be illuminated and its pedagogical implications explored and problematised. Empirically, the chapter draws upon data collected in two different learning environments – a high-performing and a lower performing one – and the empirical examples illustrate how the students’ role becomes limited in different ways in the two classrooms, having pedagogical implications for the equity as well as the democracy task of education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxon: Routledge, 2022. p. 60-75
Series
Routledge Research in Education
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Pedagogics and Educational Sciences, Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-110391DOI: 10.4324/9781003218067-5Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85143450984ISBN: 9781003218067 (electronic)ISBN: 9781032110202 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-110391DiVA, id: diva2:1638069
Available from: 2022-02-15 Created: 2022-02-15 Last updated: 2023-04-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vogt, Bettina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vogt, Bettina
By organisation
Department of Education and Teacher's PracticeEducation in Change
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 231 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf