Quantification of Complement Proteins with Special Reference to C1q: Multiplex Versus ELISA Versus Rocket Immunoelectrophoresis Versus NephelometryShow others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: The Complement System: Methods in Molecular Biology / [ed] Lubka T. Roumenina, Humana Press, 2021, Vol. 2227, p. 33-41Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
Accurate determination of complement component C1q is hampered by the fact that C1q is an immune complex binding protein. Consequently, immunochemical techniques which rely on immune complex formation in fluid phase such as nephelometry and turbidimetry tend to give results which differ from those obtained by, for example, ELISA and other solid phase-based assays. In this chapter, we discuss the pros and cons of different techniques for the quantification of C1q and present a comprehensive protocol for a newly developed magnetic bead-based sandwich immunoassay which has replaced nephelometry in our complement diagnostic laboratory at the University Hospital in Uppsala.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Humana Press, 2021. Vol. 2227, p. 33-41
Series
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN 1064-3745, E-ISSN 1940-6029 ; 2227
Keywords [en]
Humans, Complement System Proteins, ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Blood Protein Electrophoresis, C1q, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), Complement C1q, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Immunoassays, Immunoelectrophoresis, Immunomagnetic Separation, Multiplex, Nephelometry, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Plasma, Rocket immunoelectrophoresis (RIE)
National Category
Immunology in the medical area
Research subject
Biomedical Sciences, Immunology; Natural Science, Biomedical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-112011DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1016-9_3ISI: 000679413000004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104284726ISBN: 9781071610152 (print)ISBN: 9781071610169 (electronic)ISBN: 9781071610183 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-112011DiVA, id: diva2:1655829
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2016-2075-5.1Swedish Research Council, 2016-04519Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS)
Note
This work was supported by grant 2016-2075-5.1 and 2016-04519 from the Swedish Research Council (VR), the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), and by faculty grants from the Linnaeus university. The study was also supported by grants for development and validation of complement assays provided by the University Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden.
2022-05-032022-05-032022-11-09Bibliographically approved