lnu.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
(Själv)censur i fårakläder?: En kvalitativ intervjustudie om intellektuell frihet och (själv)censur på svenska skolbibliotek
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Cultural Sciences.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Cultural Sciences.
2022 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In this study we have investigated what school librarians' attitudes are towards intellectual freedom and (self) censorship. If there is any (self) censorship in school libraries we also want to know how it takes place. Our study is based on qualitative interviews with six school librarians who works with children between the ages of 6-12 years.

Our study shows that school librarians in general support intellectual freedom on a theoretical level. Only one of the informants is of the opinion that intellectual freedom is not appliable in school libraries. When it comes to the practical day to day operations in the library, IFLA’s criteria for intellectual freedom is not lived up to. The most common deviation from it is to discriminate based on age. But there are also some books with inappropriate content they choose to not acquire. One reason for this can be that the informants do not know IFLA’s standards. Another one that the librarians largely follow the values the schools stands for. Their job is after all about supporting education. Two of the informants admits that they may have done self censorship a few times. Our conclusion is that (self) censorship is more isolated occurrences than a systematic act in the profession.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 61
Keywords [sv]
Självcensur, censur, urval, skolbibliotek, intellektuell frihet
National Category
Information Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-115685OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-115685DiVA, id: diva2:1686035
Educational program
Library and information science, 180 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-08-15 Created: 2022-08-08 Last updated: 2022-08-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gorgijevska, VictoriaMalmqvist, Anton
By organisation
Department of Cultural Sciences
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 200 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf