lnu.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability of the 1 RM bench press and squat in young women
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8734-9605
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: European Journal of Physiotherapy, ISSN 2167-9169, E-ISSN 2167-9177, Vol. 15, no 3, p. 118-126Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although bench press and squat are two of the most frequently performed strength training exercises today, and are used for physical performance assessment in many sports test batteries as well as in physical therapy, studies presenting inter-rater reliability for these tests in young women appear to be lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability regarding the One Repetition Maximum (1 RM) in bench press and squats in young healthy women. Forty-one women, aged 21–30 years, participated in the present study. The subjects performed 1 RM bench press (n = 21) or 1 RM squat (n = 20) on two different occasions with an interval of 5–9 days using an inter-rater test-retest design. High reliability was noted for both the 1 RM bench press test (ICC2,1 = 0.98) and the 1 RM squat test (ICC2,1 = 0.85), with an SEM of 4% and 11%, respectively. The paired analysis revealed statistically significant difference in 1 RM squat performance between the two test sessions (p = 0.005). No statistically significant difference was found in 1 RM bench press performance between the two testing sessions. While the 1RM bench press showed excellent inter-rater reliability and could be strongly suggested as a measurement of muscle strength, the squat using free weights, as in the present study, could be questioned.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2013. Vol. 15, no 3, p. 118-126
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Social Sciences, Sport Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-120246DOI: 10.3109/21679169.2013.810305OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-120246DiVA, id: diva2:1750746
Available from: 2023-04-14 Created: 2023-04-14 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Ryman Augustsson, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ryman Augustsson, Sofia
In the same journal
European Journal of Physiotherapy
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf