lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The hub of the wheel or hitchhikers?: The potential influence of large avian herbivores on other trophic levels in wetland ecosystems
Kristianstad University, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. Kristianstad University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5071-8905
Univ Helsinki, Finland.
Kristianstad University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Hydrobiologia, ISSN 0018-8158, E-ISSN 1573-5117, Vol. 851, p. 107-127Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Goose and swan populations have increased concurrently with environmental degradation of wetlands, such as eutrophication, vegetation losses, and decrease in biodiversity. An important question is whether geese and swans contribute to such changes or if they instead benefit from them. We collected data from 37 wetlands in southern Sweden April - July 2021 to study relationships between geese, swans and other waterbird guilds, macrophytes, invertebrates, as well as physical and water chemistry variables. Neither goose nor swan abundance was negatively correlated with other trophic levels (abundance, richness, or cover). On the contrary, goose or swan abundances were positively related to abundances of surface and benthic feeding waterbirds, cover of specific macrophytes, and to invertebrate richness and abundance. Moreover, invertebrates (number of taxa or abundance) were positively associated with abundance of several waterbird guilds and total phosphorous with surface feeders, whereas water colour was positively (surface feeders) or negatively (benthic feeders) related. We conclude that waterbirds are more abundant in productive wetlands and that geese and swans do not show clear deleterious effects on other trophic levels included in this study. However, patterns may be masked at the species level, which should be addressed in further studies, complemented with experimental studies of grazing impact.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 851, p. 107-127
Keywords [en]
Geese, Invertebrates, Macrophytes, Swans, Waterbirds, Water chemistry
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Natural Science, Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-123883DOI: 10.1007/s10750-023-05317-0ISI: 001043299700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85167359193OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-123883DiVA, id: diva2:1791388
Available from: 2023-08-25 Created: 2023-08-25 Last updated: 2024-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kjeller, ElsieWaldenström, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjeller, ElsieWaldenström, Jonas
By organisation
Department of Biology and Environmental Science
In the same journal
Hydrobiologia
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf