lnu.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patients’ experiences of continuity of care: What is needed and how can it be measured?
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0338-7610
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Sustainable development
SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Abstract [en]

Aim: The overall aim for this thesis was to explore continuity of care through patients’, family carers’, and health care personnel’s perceptions, and to develop and evaluate a patient-reported experience measure of continuity of care.

Method: This thesis consists of four studies; I have a qualitative explorative design and II have a qualitative descriptive design, whereas III and IV are methodological studies. In studies I and II, data were collected from four geographically disparate areas in Sweden; in studies III and IV, data were collected in one of these areas. Data were collected using individual (I, II, III), focus groups, pair interviews (II), and questionnaires (III, IV). Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory (I), conventional content analysis (II), and according to classical test theory (III), and Rasch measurement theory (IV).

Results: For patients to experience continuity of care, all aspects were interconnected, as access to tailored information was essential for gaining mutual understanding regardless of who was performing a care task. This required clarity in responsibilities and roles, interprofessional collaboration, and a trusting relationship over time and space between each link in the patient’s care trajectory (I). Further, Study II showed that to achieve continuity of care, professional and cross disciplinary cooperation at micro, meso and macro levels were needed. Continuity of care is dependent on long-term and person-centered relationships, dynamic stability in the organizational structure, and shared responsibility for cohesive care enabling uniform solutions for knowledge and information exchange (II). Studies III and IV resulted in the Patient-Experienced Continuity of care Questionnaire (PECQ). The instrument contains 20 items measuring four dimensions of continuity of care: Information (four items), Relation (six item), Management (five item), and Knowledge (five item). Overall, the PECQ showed satisfactory measurement properties according to classical test theory and Rasch measurement theory (III, IV) regarding factor structure, unidimensional, local independence, response category function, differential item functioning for age and sex, and internal consistency reliability.

Conclusion: Continuity of care is perceived as multidimensional, containing several important aspects working in synergy and varying over time. To achieve continuity of care, information and knowledge sharing need to cross disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Collaborative responsibility is needed, vertically through all levels of the system, instead of focusing on personal responsibility horizontally. The PECQ can provide information on different dimensions of continuity, useful for driving quality improvements in the primary care context. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2023. , p. 107
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 506
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-124894DOI: 10.15626/LUD.506.2023ISBN: 9789180820790 (print)ISBN: 9789180820806 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-124894DiVA, id: diva2:1800217
Public defence
2022-10-20, Azur, Hus vita, Kalmar, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2017-00202Available from: 2023-09-26 Created: 2023-09-26 Last updated: 2024-03-19Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. What matters in care continuity on the chronic care trajectory for patients and family carers?—A conceptual model
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What matters in care continuity on the chronic care trajectory for patients and family carers?—A conceptual model
2022 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 31, no 9-10, p. 1327-1338Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract Aims and Objectives

To describe essential aspects of care continuity from the perspectives of persons with complex care needs and their family carers.

Background

Continuity of care is an important aspect of quality, safety and efficiency. For people with multiple chronic diseases and complex care needs, care must be experienced as connected and coherent, and consistent with medical and individual needs. The more complex the need for care, the greater the need for continuity across different competencies, services and roles.

Design

A constructivist grounded theory approach was applied.

Methods

Sixteen patients with one or more chronic diseases needing both health care and social care, living in their private homes, and twelve family carers, were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed with constructivist grounded theory. The COREQ checklist was followed.

Results

A conceptual model of care continuity was constructed, consisting of five categories that were interconnected through the core category: time and space. Patients' and family carers' experiences of care continuity were closely related to timely personalised care delivery, where access to tailored information, regardless of who was performing a care task, was essential for mutual understanding. This required clarity in responsibilities and roles, interprofessional collaboration and achieving a trusting relationship between each link in the chain of care, over time and space. To achieve care continuity, all the identified categories were important, as they worked in synergy, not in isolation.

Conclusion

Care continuity for people with complex care needs and family carers is experienced as multidimensional, with several essential aspects that work in synergy, but varies over time and depends on each person's own resources and situational and contextual circumstances.

Relevance to clinical practice

The findings promote understanding of patients' and family carers' experiences of care continuity and may guide the delivery of care to people with complex care needs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2022
Keywords
Complex care needs, Constructivist grounded theory, Continuity of care, Family carer
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-106115 (URN)10.1111/jocn.15989 (DOI)000681361900001 ()34351651 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85111861482 (Scopus ID)2021 (Local ID)2021 (Archive number)2021 (OAI)
Available from: 2021-08-10 Created: 2021-08-10 Last updated: 2023-09-26Bibliographically approved
2. What is needed for continuity of care and how can we achieve it?: - Perceptions among multiprofessionals on the chronic care trajectory
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What is needed for continuity of care and how can we achieve it?: - Perceptions among multiprofessionals on the chronic care trajectory
2022 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 686Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Continuity of care (CoC) implies delivery of services in a coherent, logical and timely fashion. Continuity is conceptualized as multidimensional, encompassing three specific domains - relational, management and informational continuity - with emphasis placed on their interrelations, i.e., how they affect and are affected by each other. This study sought to investigate professionals' perceptions of the prerequisites of CoC within and between organizations and how CoC can be realized for people with complex care needs. Methods This study had a qualitative design using individual, paired and focus group interviews with a purposeful sample of professionals involved in the chain of care for patients with chronic conditions across healthcare and social care services from three different geographical areas in Sweden, covering both urban and rural areas. Transcripts from interviews with 34 informants were analysed using conventional content analysis. Results CoC was found to be dependent on professional and cross-disciplinary cooperation at the micro, meso and macro system levels. Continuity is dependent on long-term and person-centred relationships (micro level), dynamic stability in organizational structures (meso level) and joint responsibility for cohesive care and enabling of uniform solutions for knowledge and information exchange (macro level). Conclusions Achieving CoC that creates coherent and long-term person-centred care requires knowledge- and information-sharing that transcends disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Collaborative accountability is needed both horizontally and vertically across micro, meso and macro system levels, rather than a focus on personal responsibility and relationships at the micro level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2022
Keywords
Continuity of care, Integrated care, Healthcare organization, Conventional content analysis
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-114215 (URN)10.1186/s12913-022-08023-0 (DOI)000800945700006 ()35606787 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85130491304 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2022-06-16 Created: 2022-06-16 Last updated: 2023-09-26Bibliographically approved
3. Measuring patients' experiences of continuity of care in a primary care context - Development and evaluation of a patient-reported experience measure
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Measuring patients' experiences of continuity of care in a primary care context - Development and evaluation of a patient-reported experience measure
Show others...
2024 (English)In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, ISSN 0309-2402, E-ISSN 1365-2648, Vol. 80, no 1, p. 387-398Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundContinuity of care is viewed as a hallmark of high-quality care in the primary care context. Measures to evaluate the quality of provider performance are scarce, and it is unclear how the assessments correlate with patients' experiences of care as coherent and interconnected over time, consistent with their preferences and care needs.AimTo develop and evaluate a patient-reported experience measure of continuity of care in primary care for patients with complex care needs.MethodThe study was conducted in two stages: (1) development of the instrument based on theory and empirical studies and reviewed for content validity (16 patients with complex care needs and 8 experts) and (2) psychometric evaluation regarding factor structure, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity. In all, 324 patients participated in the psychometric evaluation.ResultsThe Patient Experienced Continuity of care Questionnaire (PECQ) contains 20 items clustered in four dimensions of continuity of care measuring Information (four items), Relation (six items), Management (five items), and Knowledge (five items). Overall, the hypothesized factor structure was indicated. The PECQ also showed satisfactory convergent validity, internal consistency, and stability.Conclusion/ImplicationsThe PECQ is a multidimensional patient experience instrument that can provide information on various dimensions useful for driving quality improvement strategies in the primary care context for patients with complex care needs.Patient or Public ContributionPatients have participated in the content validation of the items.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024
Keywords
classic test theory, complex care needs, continuity of care, instrument development, primary healthcare, psychometric evaluation
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-123645 (URN)10.1111/jan.15792 (DOI)001034667700001 ()37485735 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85165453712 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2023-08-14 Created: 2023-08-14 Last updated: 2024-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Comprehensive summary(6138 kB)635 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6138 kBChecksum SHA-512
0be693db6b546c22b205493cde5e5996489e6f8d5b278106bc6414735a27315d7e29b3c4c8de785636d16fd7f8b430c17bc1fabb3ab36f2b67c0c9a2e81d4d2f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textBuy Book (SEK 250 + VAT and postage) lnupress@lnu.se

Authority records

Ljungholm, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungholm, Linda
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 635 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1505 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf