lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explaining leadership behaviors in private and public manager: the public–private distinction explanation versus the gender explanation
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2156-680X
2021 (English)In: Dynamic relationships management journal, ISSN 2232-5867, E-ISSN 2350-367X, Vol. 10, no 1, p. 45-56Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper assessed the theoretical explanations for similarities and differences in managers’ leadership behaviors as well as their empirical support based on data from 222 corporate managers in eight companies and 385 public managers in three public agencies in Sweden. Two explanations for similarities and differences in male and female public managers’ leadership behaviors have been suggested in previous studies. The public–private distinction says that public and private organizations are distinctly different, and thus explains differences between public and private managers leadership behaviors. Gender theory argues that the ratios of male to female managers explain of differences in leadership behaviors. However, this explanation did not explain similarities in leadership behaviors in the three Swedish public organisations investigated. The leadership behaviors of public managers were the same even though there was a female majority in management in one organization and a male majority in the other two. It is suggested that the distinct characteristics of public organizations explain the similarities in leadership behaviors of both male and female public managers. The public‐distinction explanation appears to outweigh the gender‐based explanation. © 2021 Slovenian Academy of Management. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Slovenian Academy of Management , 2021. Vol. 10, no 1, p. 45-56
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Economy, Business administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-125709DOI: 10.17708/DRMJ.2021.v10n01a03Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85140390728OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-125709DiVA, id: diva2:1813008
Available from: 2023-11-17 Created: 2023-11-17 Last updated: 2023-11-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Andersen, Jon Aarum

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersen, Jon Aarum
By organisation
Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship
In the same journal
Dynamic relationships management journal
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf