lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction - the remote exercise SWEDEHEART study
Sahlgrens University Hospital, Sweden;University of Gothenburg, Sweden;Linköping University, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital, Sweden;Lund University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1677-1566
Danderyd Hospital, Sweden.
Falu Hospital, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: The European Heart Journal - Digital Health, E-ISSN 2634-3916Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Aims Cardiac telerehabilitation addresses common barriers for attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR). Pragmatic real-world studies are however lacking, limiting generalizability of available evidence. We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient perceptions of remotely delivered EBCR in a multicentre clinical practice setting after myocardial infarction (MI).Methods and results This study included 232 post-MI patients (63.7 years, 77.5% men) from 23 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Sweden (2020-22). Exercise was delivered twice per week for 3 months through a real-time group-based video meeting connecting a physiotherapist to patients exercising at home. Outcomes were assessed before and after remote EBCR completion and comprised assessment of physical fitness, self-reported physical activity and exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy for exercise, exercise adherence, patient acceptance. Safety monitoring in terms of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) was recorded. A total of 67.2% of the patients attended >= 75% of prescribed exercise sessions. Significant improvements in physical fitness, self-reported exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, and HRQoL were observed. Patients agreed that remote EBCR improved health care access (83%), was easy to use (94%) and found exercise performance and interaction acceptable (95%). Sixteen exercise-related AEs (most commonly dizziness and musculoskeletal symptoms) were registered, all of which were resolved. Two SAEs requiring hospitalization were reported, both unrelated to exercise.Conclusion This multicentre study supports remote EBCR post-MI as feasible and safe with a high patient acceptance in a real-world setting. The clinical effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.Trial registration number NCT04260958.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025.
Keywords [en]
Cardiac rehabilitation, Coronary artery disease, Exercise, Secondary prevention, eHealth, Telerehabilitation
National Category
Rehabilitation Medicine Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences, Health Informatics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-137435DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf014ISI: 001446836400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-137435DiVA, id: diva2:1948079
Available from: 2025-03-27 Created: 2025-03-27 Last updated: 2025-03-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Olovsson, Jessica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Leosdottir, MargretOlovsson, Jessica
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring Sciences
In the same journal
The European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Rehabilitation MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf