lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Från sockenkommun till storkommun: En analys av storkommunreformens genomförande 1939-1952 i en nationell och lokal kontext
Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Humanities.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8224-9915
2003 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The primary aim of this study is to provide a deeper and more complete understanding of why the great municipal amalgamation (storkommunreformen) during the 1940s became the political solution to the problem that the Government believed many of Sweden’s municipalities had in satisfactorily providing for a local welfare society. The study also describes the results of this large-scale reorganization process. The events examined include the political decision-making process at the national level that took place during 1939-1949, as well as the regional/local realization of these decisions during 1946-1952.

The parliamentary treatment of the municipal division issue should be viewed as a good example of what researchers have termed a Swedish decision-making model. One clear manifestation of this was the fact that the national commission that investigated the question primarily formulated the principles for the reform. The committee’s proposal received strong endorsements in the reports from the reviewers of the proposal. The government authorities and many of the municipalities felt that a new division of municipalities was justified. Opposition that did occur came mostly from rural municipalities with small populations. Many of these municipalities believed that the present municipal divisions functioned well as they were.

Of those municipalities that were affected by amalgamation, 39 percent of them did not agree with the decision. The majority of these could agree to merge with other municipalities, but not with the municipalities stipulated by the authorities. Considering the fact that the then current divisions were based on a long tradition, demands for retaining independence could have been greater. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that 66 percent of all larger municipalities were formed using some level of force. This still indicated a relatively widely distributed opposition to the amalgamation decisions, however.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Växjö University Press , 2003. , p. 342
Series
Acta Wexionensia, ISSN 1404-4307 ; 25/2003
Keywords [en]
municipal amalgamation, Swedish decision-making model, local self government
National Category
History
Research subject
Humanities, History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-384ISBN: 91-7636-370-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vxu-384DiVA, id: diva2:206683
Public defence
2003-06-06, Homeros, Växjö universitet, 351 95, Växjö, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-12-16 Created: 2005-12-16 Last updated: 2016-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3938 kB)5864 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3938 kBChecksum MD5
a2c6456fee80c0eb1f936f2a605dcc05259568c4c66ba085326b96523c977a647afce413
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Wångmar, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wångmar, Erik
By organisation
School of Humanities
History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5864 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1288 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf