lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Iconicity as Meaning Miming Meaning and Meaning Miming Form
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Language and Literature.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8664-1970
2010 (English)In: Iconicity in Language and Literature, ISSN 1873-5037, Vol. 9, p. 73-100Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Iconicity consists of mimetic relations between form and meaning. This article is based on the notion of ‘spatial thinking’ and it is argued that there is no form without meaning, and that all meaning has some sort of form. Two fundamental distinctions are used. The first is Charles Sanders Peirce’s well-known division into three types of iconicity: image, diagram, and metaphor, which is extended to include ‘weak’ and ‘strong diagrams’. The second is a distinction between ontologically different appearances of signs: visual material signs, auditory material signs, and complex cognitive signs. A two-dimensional model illustrating the relations between these two distinctions is presented. The model is based on the assumption that iconicity, to a certain extent, is gradable, and it shows that the field of iconicity includes many phenomena that are not generally seen as related, but that nevertheless can be systematically compared. It also shows, among other things, that the ‘metaphor’ and the ‘weak diagram’ are singled out by the capacity of miming across the borders both between the visual and the auditory, and between the material and the mental. The main argument of the article is that iconicity should be understood not only as “form miming meaning and form miming form”, but also as “meaning miming meaning and meaning miming form”.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Philadelphia och Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 2010. Vol. 9, p. 73-100
Keywords [en]
iconicity, miming, form, meaning, intermediality, C. S. Peirce, spatial thinking
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-6186ISBN: 9789027243454 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-6186DiVA, id: diva2:324481
Available from: 2010-06-15 Created: 2010-06-15 Last updated: 2018-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Elleström, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elleström, Lars
By organisation
School of Language and Literature
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 340 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf