lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vem får ordet?: En studie av genus och eliter i Debatts webb-program Eftersnack
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Who gets the word? : A study of gender and elites in Debatt's Web Application Eftersnack (English)
Abstract [sv]

Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka vilken grupp människor som till största del fick komma till tals i webb-programmet Eftersnack. Deltagarna i programmet valde vi att dela in i fyra grupper, män, kvinnor, elitpersoner och personer från allmänheten. Vi undersökte också vilka typer av frågor som reportern ställde till respektive grupp. Vi analyserade om det fanns likheter eller olikheter bland frågorna till de olika grupperna. Av de 15 avsnitt som vi tog med i vår analys fick vi ett resultat som visade att männen fick mer utrymme än kvinnorna i webb-programmet. Av statusgrupperna fick elitpersonerna mest plats i programmet jämfört med personer från allmänheten. Sammanfattningsvis fick manliga elitpersoner mest utrymme i programmet. Frågorna som vi analyserade skilde sig mellan könen och statusgrupperna. Männen och elitpersonerna fick korta och mer kritiska frågor medan kvinnorna och personer från allmänheten fick öppnare och mer vaga frågor.

Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to see which type of persons that got to be heard in the web broadcast of the debate show Eftersnack. We divided the participants into four different groups; women, men, elite persons and members of the public. We also wanted to analyse if there were any differences in the questions asked to the different groups. In the 15 episodes we chose to analyse we found that 60 percent of the participants in the show were men. The elite persons were given more space and time than members of the public. Thus, elite men got most time to say what they wanted to say. We also found that the questions differed depending on who was asked. Men and elite persons had to answer shorter and more critical questions while the women and members of the public were given vague and open questions that were easier to answer.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 40
Keywords [en]
Web TV, gender, elites, SVT, interview
Keywords [sv]
Webb-tv, genus, eliter, SVT, intervju
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-10388OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-10388DiVA, id: diva2:392760
Presentation
(Swedish)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-01-31 Created: 2011-01-27 Last updated: 2011-01-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Vem får ordet?(605 kB)265 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 605 kBChecksum SHA-512
c9566935d0c4f0508b8461df0b341dc257679f309e925d0d90c8f8e352fece142a86ce908d7ae5cd2c174cd2f6c53f0c214db5340a2f65faae5fdb6b8f8925b7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pending, Lina
By organisation
School of Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 265 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf