lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Macroptery in altitudinal specialists versus brachyptery in generalists - a paradox of alpine Scandinavian carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).
University of Kalmar, School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences. (Palaeoecology)ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5919-2277
1993 (English)In: Journal of Biogeography, ISSN 0305-0270, E-ISSN 1365-2699, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 227-234Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Non-riparian alpine carabid beetle assemblages in Scandinavia are usually dominated by a set of seventeen species. Five of these species are more or less restricted to the alpine and subalpine regions (altitudinal specialists), whereas the remaining twelve species are widespread also in lowland (altitudinal generalists). Flight-wing length differs between these two groups of species, i.e. all altitudinal specialists are macropterous, whereas seven of the generalists are brachypterous or dimorphic with the brachypterous morph strongly dominating. Generalists abundant in lowland forests are all brachypterous, whereas the macropterous species in lowland are confined to open, dry habitats. The dominance of macroptery among altitudinal specialists is paradoxical as the alpine environment generally is supposed to select for brachyptery, and the specialists should be better adapted to their habitat than the generalists are. Available subfossil evidence suggests that the specialist species reached the Scandinavian Mountain Range from a continental refugium south of the ice sheet. The macroptery of the specialists can be explained by the relative recentness of the last glaciation and the lower dispersal power of the brachypterous or apterous tundra species that have not been able to colonize Scandinavia from their glacial refugia. The time available for colonization of generalist species following deglaciation was probably much longer than for specialists, and consequently brachypterous species were successful. Wing dimorphism as a tool for reconstructing faunal history is discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1993. Vol. 20, no 2, p. 227-234
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Science, Paleoecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-16801DOI: 10.2307/2845674OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-16801DiVA, id: diva2:477483
Available from: 2012-01-13 Created: 2012-01-13 Last updated: 2025-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Lemdahl, Geoffrey

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lemdahl, Geoffrey
By organisation
School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Biogeography
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf