lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two year outcome of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme focused on range of motion of the neck and back
Mid Sweden University, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health, Social Work and Behavioural Sciences, School of Education, Psychology and Sport Science. Mid Sweden University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6653-3414
2010 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 37, no 4, p. 341-348Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To investigate whether improvement of range of motion (ROM) in persons with musculoskeletal disorders, mainly neck and back pain, was associated with a favourable development regarding physical disability, pain, and health-related quality of life (QoL), and whether such development differed between sick-listed and non-sick-listed persons during and up to 2 years after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme.

METHODS: Ten persons with full-time sick leave (Group I) and 49 with part-time or no sick leave (Group II) at the end of a previous study participated. It was shown in that study that Group I had higher pain rating and higher subjective physical disability than Group II, with little or no improvement during and after rehabilitation. In the present study, all participants were evaluated with neck and back mobility tests: Disability Rating Index (DRI); Pain Intensity Rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS); and Global Self-Efficacy Index (GSI).

RESULTS: Cervical and thoracolumbar spine ROM were lower in Group I than in Group II from the start of rehabilitation to a 2-year follow-up. Only Group II showed a temporal improvement in ROM. No changes in DRI, VAS or GSI were found in parallel with corresponding temporal changes in any of the ROM.

CONCLUSION: Group II but not Group I improved in active ROM during rehabilitation; further, in Group I active ROM in the cervical and thoracolumbar spine did not improve during the 2-year follow-up. Improvement of ROM showed no correlation with physical disability, pain or QoL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 37, no 4, p. 341-348
Keywords [en]
Back pain, Disability, Mobility, Musculoskeletal disorders, Neck pain, Quality of life, Rehabilitation
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-33232DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1088ISI: 000284534500003PubMedID: 21099009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-78650619332OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-33232DiVA, id: diva2:707480
Available from: 2009-12-10 Created: 2014-03-24 Last updated: 2023-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Alricsson, Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alricsson, Marie
By organisation
School of Education, Psychology and Sport Science
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf