lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On climate change skepticism and denial in tourism
University of Canterbury, New Zealand ; University of Oulu, Finland.
Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, ISSN 0966-9582, E-ISSN 1747-7646, Vol. 23, no 1, 4-25 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The period leading to and immediately after the release of the IPCC's fifth series of climate change assessments saw substantial efforts by climate change denial interests to portray anthropogenic climate change (ACC) as either unproven theory or a negligible contribution to natural climate variability, including the relationship between tourism and climate change. This paper responds to those claims by stressing that the extent of scientific consensus suggests that human-induced warming of the climate system is unequivocal. Second, it responds in the context of tourism research and ACC, highlighting tourism's significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, as well as climate change's potential impacts on tourism at different scales. The paper exposes the tactics used in ACC denial papers to question climate change science by referring to non-peer-reviewed literature, outlier studies, and misinterpretation of research, as well as potential links to think tanks and interest groups. The paper concludes that climate change science does need to improve its communication strategies but that the world-view of some individuals and interests likely precludes acceptance. The connection between ACC and sustainability illustrates the need for debate on adaptation and mitigation strategies, but that debate needs to be grounded in scientific principles not unsupported skepticism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2015. Vol. 23, no 1, 4-25 p.
Keyword [en]
Climate change denial, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate change consensus, Climate models, Climate change mitigation, Greenhouse gas emissions
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Research subject
Tourism
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-38747DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2014.953544OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-38747DiVA: diva2:774327
Available from: 2014-12-22 Created: 2014-12-22 Last updated: 2017-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gössling, Stefan
In the same journal
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 132 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf