lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
After the Working-Class Movement?: An Essay on What's 'New' and What's 'Social' in the New Social Movements
University of Copenhagen, Denmark. (FPF (Forum för professionsforskning))
1988 (English)In: Acta Sociologica, ISSN 0001-6993, E-ISSN 1502-3869, Vol. 31, no 1, 15-34 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the early 1980s many social theorists claimed that the ‘New Social Move­ments’ (NSMs) were the authentic social movements of our time. This claim is discussed in relation to two traditions in the analysis of social movements. The ‘American’ tradition focuses on the single-issue movement of a protest and mobilizing character. The ‘European’ tradition focuses on the relation between major societal changes and processes of class formation, the labour movement being the classic case.

In the article the women’s movement is discussed as a major cultural revolutionary movement; the different campaigns dealing with the new urban forms of socialized reproduction» housing, planning, etc., as movements for the defence of the 'real consumption’; the green and environmentalist movements taking up the conflicting relation nature-society.

Is the relation between the NSMs and the new and growing social strata of students and employees within the welfare state, which make up their audience and activist core, to be understood as a parallel to the part played by the ‘old’ social movements in the making of the working class, the farmer class, etc? It is argued that there is no ‘necessary’ relationship between the socictal changes and the NSMs, as there was between industrialization and the labour movement.

The societal relations and changes around which the NSMs organize themselves - gender contradictions, socialization of reproduction, con­tradictions in the forms of modern urban living, nature society - do not single out a new social force as their ‘natural’ counterpart. They are both more encompassing in their reach and more non-partisan in character. The most likely centre for a possible coalescence of a multitude of NSMs into a major social movement, if not in the class formative sense, is the societally basic relationship, nature-society.

The themes and issues raised by the NSMs can in the political process become articulated with existing political and social forces. The capacity of these forces and institutions to absorb the issues raised by the NSMs deter­mine the possibility for the NSMs to emerge as a new major social force.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1988. Vol. 31, no 1, 15-34 p.
Keyword [en]
working class movement, new social movements
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Social Sciences, Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-41459OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-41459DiVA: diva2:799088
Available from: 2015-03-30 Created: 2015-03-30 Last updated: 2015-03-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olofsson, Gunnar
In the same journal
Acta Sociologica
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 41 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf