lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impregnation of fir (Abies borisii regis) and spruce (Picea excelsa) wood with rape oil and CCB preservative
Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Greece.
Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Greece.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6909-2025
Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Wood Structure, Properties and Quality – 2014: 5th RCCWS International Symposium, Moscow State University Press, 2014, 77-82 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The objective of this study was to examine the retention (kg/m³) and the penetration depth (mm) as well as the impregnated area of cross sections (%) along the hole length, in fir (Abies borisii regis) and spruce (Picea excelsa) wood, after preservative treatment with rape oil and CCB preservative (3,2 %). The wood specimens (5×5 cm or 10×10cm in cross section and 40 cm long) with true radial and tangential surfaces, were treated with the full cell pro-cess. In order to determine the effect of direction (axial, lateral/radial or tangential) on pene-tration of rape oil and CCB preservative, the surfaces of the specimens were coated (laterally in all surfaces and in cross sections, respectively). Retention of rape oil ranged between 21,06 and 78,51 kg/m3 in fir specimens and between 11,20 and 90,32 kg/m3 in spruce specimens, while retention of CCB preservatives fluctuated between 1,68 and 10,05 kg/m3 in fir and be-tween 1,86 and 6,80 kg/m3 in spruce specimens. Penetration depth in all directions as well as impregnated area of cross sections of wood specimens were found to be lower in spruce than in fir for rape oil and, in most cases, for CCB preservative tested. The general conclusion is that both species are difficult to impregnation, but fir is more permeable than spruce.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Moscow State University Press, 2014. 77-82 p.
Keyword [en]
fir/spruce wood, impregnation, rape oil, CCB, retention/penetration
National Category
Wood Science
Research subject
Technology (byts ev till Engineering), Forestry and Wood Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-41835ISBN: 978-5-8135-0625-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-41835DiVA: diva2:800893
Conference
5th RCCWS International Symposium “Wood Structure, Properties and Quality – 2014”, September 22 – 25, Moscow–Mytischi, Russia
Available from: 2015-04-08 Created: 2015-04-08 Last updated: 2017-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

KonferensprogramKonferensens webbplats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Adamopoulos, Stergios
Wood Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf